What’s the likelihood that we see civil unrest soon?

The easy and logical definition would be "any weapon that can fire more than x rounds in y seconds."
That’s any semi automatic rifle or handgun. The question is how fast is your trigger finger. So no. Not easy or logical. Try again
 
That’s not hard to find. Once again it’s something you have to pay attention to. He’s aiming for AR-15s first and even made the comment to ban calibers such as 9mm.
His agenda is out there for anyone to see. He's been videoed saying he's coming after your AR. It's not a secret. The dems have introduced literally dozens of bills for new gun control measures. They're not hiding their agenda. He's also banned Russian ammo imports therefore keeping ammo prices high.
 
I'm not sure he's a good man. He's at least a bigot and maybe more, and he and his family are cheats. I'm amazed by some people definition of a good man. I hate to see what a bad man looks like.
Biden is everything they acused Trump of and more. He's a sex offender, he's manipulator, he's used political influence for personal gain, he's sold out to foreign adversaries. He's a pos.
 
His agenda is out there for anyone to see. He's been videoed saying he's coming after your AR. It's not a secret. The dems have introduced literally dozens of bills for new gun control measures. They're not hiding their agenda. He's also banned Russian ammo imports therefore keeping ammo prices high.
Yeah I just wasn’t gonna get into all that. It’s easy for anyone to see so asking that question it’s actually ridiculous
 
That’s any semi automatic rifle or handgun. The question is how fast is your trigger finger. So no. Not easy or logical. Try again
Sure it's easy and logical.
More than twenty-two rounds in 5 seconds = assault weapon.......see
 
Any thing the government has we can have according to the constitution. Regardless of what Joe thinks. No need to explain a thing.

Que the brain dead liberal response of "Well, ok then, the Constitution doesn't say anything about not owning nuclear weapons. Guess we should be able to own those too!!!!"

In 3......2.......1......
 
Que the brain dead liberal response of "Well, ok then, the Constitution doesn't say anything about not owning nuclear weapons. Guess we should be able to own those too!!!!"

In 3......2.......1......
My argument to that would be the same. If the government has it, the constitution says we can too (not that anyone would ever want one). I can own a tank if I have the money for one. Joe said I couldn’t but he’s wrong. I can own anything they have including but not limited to automatic weapons. WE gave up that right a long time ago and it was the stupidest move we’ve ever made.
 
Yep. I can do it with every semi automatic weapon I have including handguns. But this description only strengthened my point to @USAFgolferVol that he’s coming after EVERYTHING outside of revolvers.
I think our shotguns and hunting rifles are safe. Until serious legislation is proposed, I'll leave the speculation to you.
 
List the issues with him, his family and his kids.

If I started listing Biden's it would be a mile long. I'm not talking about the imperfections of being human, I'm talking about repeated plagarism which goes back to character, Hunter business deals that Joe is in on and his brother's dealings. Apparently his first senate campaign in the 70's was marred with controversy with Jill's ex husband.
You aren't aware of Trump's list? Really?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
You might take a very different outlook if you spent a few months reading about the history of militias in America.
No, I wouldn’t because the words of the constitution would not change. The constitution was put in place as a last defense to tyrannical government. So it absolutely meant that we have the right to MATCH the weaponry. There is no argument to that and it’s not up for debate
 

VN Store



Back
Top