What’s the likelihood that we see civil unrest soon?

No, I wouldn’t because the words of the constitution would not change. The constitution was put in place as a last defense to tyrannical government. So it absolutely meant that we have the right to MATCH the weaponry. There is no argument to that and it’s not up for debate
It might not be changed but it can be debated and has been for decades.
 
No, I wouldn’t because the words of the constitution would not change. The constitution was put in place as a last defense to tyrannical government. So it absolutely meant that we have the right to MATCH the weaponry. There is no argument to that and it’s not up for debate

You wouldn't because as long as you do not know what those words meant to the founders, those words mean whatever you want them to mean. That is how some people like it. We both know that there are people who read 5A with no regard for the intent to preserve the right to own firearms, but the flip side is that some peep read it with no regard for its other purposes. Again, if you will spend a few months reading serious scholarship on the subject, you might find yourself with a more complete perspective.
 
Last edited:
Not true. When I hog hunt I use my AR-15 and my FK Brno as a sidearm. It depends on your post site and what you’re hunting. If we’re ground bound, it’s my weapon of choice. In a tree stand, I go bolt action
That's what YOU do. You seem to think all your opinions are held by a majority of Americans
 
You wouldn't because as long as you do not know what those words meant to the founders, those words mean whatever you want them to mean. That is how some people like it.
It’s not like they spoke a different language man. I take it just as it’s written. “A well organized militia (civilians) being ‘necessary’ to the security of a free state. The right of the people to keep and bear (match) arms shall NOT be infringed”. You gotta have comprehension problems to not understand what those words mean. It’s not up for debate.
 
It’s not like they spoke a different language man. I take it just as it’s written. “A well organized militia (civilians) being ‘necessary’ to the security of a free state. The right of the people to keep and bear (match) arms shall NOT be infringed”. You gotta have comprehension problems to not understand what those words mean. It’s not up for debate.

Of course the meaning of those words are up for debate.
 
So every semi automatic rifle or handgun. Got it. You’re ignorant to the subject. You have no idea how to explain “assault weapon” any more than the next ignorant leftist.
I just gave you the criteria.
Sorry you don't like it, I take that as proof it's a great definition.
 
It would be a small percentage of overall avid hunters

I guess "small" is a matter of contextual opinion. (Insert joke here) Among the traditionally minded a nice lever or bolt action is fine. It worked then and works now. Having said that several AR makers offer models specifically aimed at hunters (Varmint/predator/hog hunting has heavily shifted that direction) and there's sufficient demand for multiple manufacturers to produce dedicated medium game ammo.

The 7 Best .223 Loads for Deer Hunting
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8 and hog88
I just gave you the criteria.
Sorry you don't like it, I take that as proof it's a great definition.
No. You basically just said “I don’t know the difference in one gun from another so therefore my “feelings” are more important than your rights”. You can’t define what you don’t understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
I guess "small" is a matter of contextual opinion. (Insert joke here) Among the traditionally minded a nice lever or bolt action is fine. It worked then and works now. Having said that several AR makers offer models specifically aimed at hunters (Varmint/predator/hog hunting has heavily shifted that direction) and there's sufficient demand for multiple manufacturers to produce dedicated medium game ammo.

The 7 Best .223 Loads for Deer Hunting
You're never going to convince a princess of anything gun related.
 
Then debate them accurately. Don’t give some “maybe” this or “maybe” that. The way I wrote it here is exactly how it’s written. Go

Forgive me for not accepting writing assignments. I know it is what we are discussing, so I am not complaining and will try to get back to you. First, I'll say something real quick. I have a history of writing in support of 2A. Frankly, you won't see better arguments for it than mine. But the mass murders we have suffered over the past years demand consideration.
 
Biden is everything they acused Trump of and more. He's a sex offender, he's manipulator, he's used political influence for personal gain, he's sold out to foreign adversaries. He's a pos.

I think that's why they accused Trump of it first to get ahead of it. Even the continued mental acuity questions. A form of hopeful reverse psychology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Forgive me for not accepting writing assignments. I know it is what we are discussing, so I am not complaining and will try to get back to you.
Good luck. Democrats have been trying for years so I seriously doubt you’ll come up with anything more BS than they’ve already tried before.
 

VN Store



Back
Top