What’s the likelihood that we see civil unrest soon?

[luthervol]

No. You basically just said “I don’t know the difference in one gun from another so therefore my “feelings” are more important than your rights”. You can’t define what you don’t understand.

That's just absurd.
Let's take this approach.

You give me a better definition of "assault weapon".

This will be fascinating.......can't wait.

 

[USAFgolferVol]

In this country. You may not be left but you gotta be democrat because you’re not making much sense.

Never been a Democrat, and not in this country are your opinions held by a majority. You even said most everyone you hang around with are conservatives so how could you possibly have an informed perspective of the opinions of a majority of Americans

 

[USAFgolferVol]

There is no such thing as an “assault rifle”. There are just differences in actions.

I know. It's ambiguous

 

[luthervol]

There is no such thing as an “assault rifle”. There are just differences in actions.

It all comes down to the amount of indiscriminate carnage that can be inflicted in a small amount of time.

That is why x rounds per y seconds is the perfect approach.

 

[Vol Main]

Good luck. Democrats have been trying for years so I seriously doubt you’ll come up with anything more BS than they’ve already tried before.

Most of the arguments I see against 2A are unworthy of the topic. They are ill conceived with total bias.

 

[whodeycin85]

People have concerns. Sometimes they are real and sometimes they are not real. Look it, I do not approve of everything Democrats do, but Biden is a decent man. He might not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but he has been around the track long enough to know his job, and I think he is doing fairly well at it. Our differences are probably in the way we perceive events. I try to look at the elements of every issue, so that is what I would need to do to address your concerns.

So you thinking being opening racist and pushing racist ideology is being a decent person??? I also guess you choose to not believe the disgusting stuff regarding Hunter, his granddaughter and other stuff that's come out...

 

[hog88]

It all comes down to the amount of indiscriminate carnage that can be inflicted in a small amount of time.

That why x rounds per y seconds is the perfect approach.

Then you should support the possession of fully automatic weapons, that’s the only way to control your silly formula.

 

[1vol8]

Then you explain it.

There is no such thing as an “assault” weapon. It’s a term created by Dems to strike fear in those who don’t understand. What they want to ban is anything that “looks” scary. If it “looks” scary, it’s an assault weapon.

But let’s dig deeper. The word “assault” means to strike reasonable fear that violence is about to take place. The fact that they attached that word to them tells you right off that it’s anything that looks scary.

 

[1vol8]

Never been a Democrat, and not in this country are your opinions held by a majority. You even said most everyone you hang around with are conservatives so how could you possibly have an informed perspective of the opinions of a majority of Americans

Because a true American believes in the constitution of the United States

 

[USAFgolferVol]

So you thinking being opening racist and pushing racist ideology is being a decent person??? I also guess you choose to not believe the disgusting stuff regarding Hunter, his granddaughter and other stuff that's come out...

All those things may be true, but at least the whole damn family aren't his closest advisors in the White House.

 

[1vol8]

That's just absurd.
Let's take this approach.

You give me a better definition of "assault weapon".

This will be fascinating.......can't wait.

Post 1158

 

[luthervol]

Then you should support the possession of fully automatic weapons, that’s the only way to control your silly formula.

?????????
If they can't fire more than x rounds in y seconds then, I'm fine with them.

 

[luthervol]

Post 1158

So you can't define it but I can..........go figure.

 

[Vol Main]

There is no such thing as an “assault” weapon. It’s a term created by Dems to strike fear in those who don’t understand. What they want to ban is anything that “looks” scary. If it “looks” scary, it’s an assault weapon.

But let’s dig deeper. The word “assault” means to strike reasonable fear that violence is about to take place. The fact that they attached that word to them tells you right off that it’s anything that looks scary.

"The StG 44 (abbreviation of Sturmgewehr 44, "assault rifle 44") is a German selective-fire assault rifle developed during World War II by Hugo Schmeisser."

Why are you blaming Democrats for the German name of a weapon class developed during WWII? You can argue about it not being the first, but there is no question about its name.

 

[whodeycin85]

All those things may be true, but at least the whole damn family aren't his closest advisors in the White House.

Ill take a family of advisors over a rasict, drug addled, family of pedophiles any day of the week

 

[1vol8]

?????????
If they can't fire more than x rounds in y seconds then I'm fine with them.

My sidearm that I carry every day is a Sig P 320. It holds 21 +1 of 9mm. I can fire all 22 in less than 5 seconds. Is that an “assault” weapon?

 

[1vol8]

So you can't define it but I can..........go figure.

I just did. It doesn’t exist

 

[1vol8]

So you can't define it but I can..........go figure.

And you failed at defining a difference in an assault weapon vs ANY other semi automatic weapon

 

[luthervol]

My sidearm that I carry every day is a Sig P 320. It holds 21 +1 of 9mm. I can fire all 22 in less than 5 seconds. Is that an “assault” weapon?

If the definition is more than 22 rounds in 5 seconds, then no.
If the definition is 22 or more rounds in 5 seconds, then yes.

If I got to define it, yes it would be an assault weapon.

 

[luthervol]

And you failed at defining a difference in an assault weapon vs ANY other semi automatic weapon

I did exactly that.

 

[USAFgolferVol]

There is no such thing as an “assault” weapon. It’s a term created by Dems to strike fear in those who don’t understand. What they want to ban is anything that “looks” scary. If it “looks” scary, it’s an assault weapon.

But let’s dig deeper. The word “assault” means to strike reasonable fear that violence is about to take place. The fact that they attached that word to them tells you right off that it’s anything that looks scary.

Does "they" include Reagan, HW Bush, Powell, Rice, etc., because all of them have spoken out against that type of gun. You refer to "leftists" as the prominent group opposing ownership to such weapons. Reagan was the first President to speak out against ownership of such rifles. We're you aware of that? So in reality it's not just "leftists".

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

And you failed at defining a difference in an assault weapon vs ANY other semi automatic weapon

Luther is playing the dunce cap dude today. Throws chit out there hoping it'll stick.

 

[BreatheUT]

So you thinking being opening racist and pushing racist ideology is being a decent person??? I also guess you choose to not believe the disgusting stuff regarding Hunter, his granddaughter and other stuff that's come out...

Didn't Biden tell Cardi B his grand daughter is a big fan? Music that tells girls to put a mans privates in the worst places. Biden is a used car selling weirdo.

The interview was like being a fly on the wall listening to two kids talk about they were promoted up to special ed during the year.

 

[1vol8]

"The StG 44 (abbreviation of Sturmgewehr 44, "assault rifle 44") is a German selective-fire assault rifle developed during World War II by Hugo Schmeisser.

“Selective fire”. Meaning you can select semi automatic or fully automatic. Which means this is a rifle not available to us but only military. Still no such thing as an “assault weapon” no matter how the author describes it in his own words

 

[USAFgolferVol]

Because a true American believes in the constitution of the United States

Most do yes, but not necessarily your interpretation of it. You're no more of a " true American" than anyone else that posts in this forum