Matt2496
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 13,894
- Likes
- 21,938
Ok, but again, your tax return doesn’t say that. Mark Zuckerberg could take $1 salary from FB and if he didn’t have any options that year he’d appear broke.I suspect he's not as rich as he's claimed. He's shown an unhealthy ego about being called a billionaire. I totally believe it's megalomania.
He filed a financial disclosure which the election committee investigates. The tax returns serve two purposes for you. 1. If he isn't a billionaire you can go HE ISN'T A BILLIONAIRE (pat myself on the back)..or 2. Used against him anyway possible. Now I say anyway possible because your ilk will attempt to drum up some bogus BS no one cares about like effective tax rates or that he claimed his tanning bed as a business expense.I'm sorry but tax returns are at a whole different level than college transcripts, and you know it. For decades we have had a general picture of a presidential candidate's finances, viewed through the prism of their tax returns. It is more than just custom as it serves an important purpose -- to ensure that he does not act in his own interests over ours.
The comparison to Obama's college trancripts is a pretty pathetic effort to dodge the question with the weakest whataboutism.
And? Clintons IRS let him get away with?The first paragraph of the NY Times article:
"President Trump participated in dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud, that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents, an investigation by The New York Times has found. "
That's stunning because they balk at even calling his daily falsehoods lies.
The first paragraph of the NY Times article:
"President Trump participated in dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud, that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents, an investigation by The New York Times has found. "
That's stunning because they balk at even calling his daily falsehoods lies.
He filed a financial disclosure which the election committee investigates. The tax returns serve two purposes for you. 1. If he isn't a billionaire you can go HE ISN'T A BILLIONAIRE (pat myself on the back)..or 2. Used against him anyway possible. Now I say anyway possible because your ilk will attempt to drum up some bogus BS no one cares about like effective tax rates or that he claimed his tanning bed as a business expense.
I'm confused, are the tax strategies "questionable", "suspect" or illegal?
Seems like that's really the only question worth asking. If it's not illegal, I want to know how to employ those strategies.
Slow news day?"I'm under a routine audit, and it'll be released, and as soon as the audit is finished it will be released"
---Trump at the first presidential debate
I continue to be mystified by the lack of either an explanation for this or concern as to what he does not want us to see. Tax returns for presidential candidates are routinely disclosed. It sure looked at the time like Trump was hiding something. He was uncomfortable with the question and his demeanor was clearly evasive.
A routine audit would have been long ago finished. And if it wasn't, the WH could just say so. IMO this is a campaign promise which the press and both the GOP and the Dems should require that he honor.