Who is the best COACH

Who is the best COACH

  • Total voters
    0
#205
#205
Being a drunk isn't immoral in my opinion, for the record. A lot of you are putting words in my mouth. It's stupid, moronic, and self-destructive, but not immoral in my opinion.
 
#211
#211
SaintBruce said:
Find where I have contradicted myself one time, and I will concede your point.
Click to expand...


I doubt that. You're "Likes to argue on the internet guy". Thats why you started the thread in the first place, and you were called out on that from the start by me. I have neither the time nor the inclination to continue to contribute to an argument set forth by someone who is judging morality on a f-ing message board. "Your wrong, Im right" back and forth 3rd grade bull crap has lost its appeal to me.

I wish you the best, but when everyone decides to stop playing with you, you'll undoubtedly crank out another useless thread for the sake of arguing. Only next time, your tired agenda will have been exposed.

Go argue about DUI's, Pearl, and whatever in the hell else you want to, to someone in the cubicle or sandbox next door.
 
#212
#212
So someone can be the "taint of society" without doing anything immoral? Either you were bloviating emptily earlier with with all your pompous, judgmental pronouncements about what scumbags anybody who's had a DUI are, and you didn't really mean any of it, or now you're trying to draw such a thin distinction as to what counts as "immoral" that the word is meaningless.
 
#219
#219
SaintBruce said:
Moral relativism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...

What does moral relativism have to do with anything? You're the one that made all these absolutist pronouncements about what scumbags DUI convicts are. And then you backed off and claimed that they didn't do anything immoral, merely illegal. If it's merely the illegality of the act that's the problem, then why are DUI convicts any more "taints of society" than people convicted of speeding or jaywalking or other misdemeanors? If there's some component there that makes DUI convicts "extra" bad, then what is that component other than (im)morality? I realize you're trying to have it both ways here, but this is fuzzy thinking even by internet message board standards.
 
#220
#220
Vercingetorix said:
If it's merely the illegality of the act that's the problem, then why are DUI convicts any more "taints of society" than people convicted of speeding or jaywalking or other misdemeanors?.
Click to expand...

Let me preface this by reiterating what I said at the beginning of this, so it isn't lost on anyone. I am talking about grown men and women here. College freshmen, high school kids, et al get a little slack from me because they likely don't understand all of the consequences of their actions... Moving on

---

People that knowingly make a decision that risks their freedom, livelihood, personal safety, and at times the safety of others have serious decision making issues. My opinion is that these people are morons, immature, and most likely people that I would never associate myself with, which is why I call them the taint of society. Again this is just my opinion. I see a lot of you find nothing wrong at all with drinking and driving, good on you. Drink another one.

How is this different from jaywalking? Do we really have to go there?

Now, I think I have explained as well as I am going to be able to, and it has nothing to do with morality. I don't think it's immoral to be a drunk, shoot heroin, or bang 2 dollar hookers every Sunday morning, so everyone can stop trying to project their beliefs and opinions about morality on me.
 
#222
#222
SaintBruce said:
Let me preface this by reiterating what I said at the beginning of this, so it isn't lost on anyone. I am talking about grown men and women here. College freshmen, high school kids, et al get a little slack from me because they likely don't understand all of the consequences of their actions... Moving on

---

People that knowingly make a decision that risks their freedom, livelihood, personal safety, and at times the safety of others have serious decision making issues. My opinion is that these people are morons, immature, and most likely people that I would never associate myself with, which is why I call them the taint of society. Again this is just my opinion. I see a lot of you find nothing wrong at all with drinking and driving, good on you. Drink another one.

How is this different from jaywalking? Do we really have to go there?

Now, I think I have explained as well as I am going to be able to, and it has nothing to do with morality. I don't think it's immoral to be a drunk, shoot heroin, or bang 2 dollar hookers every Sunday morning, so everyone can stop trying to project their beliefs and opinions about morality on me.
Click to expand...

I believe jaywalking puts yourself as well as others in harms way, at least that's the reasoning behind the laws prohibiting it. In essence some of the very same reasons for prohibiting drinking and driving apply to jaywalking........try again.
 
#223
#223
KB5252 said:
I believe jaywalking puts yourself as well as others in harms way,
Click to expand...
I think you're talking about literally walking in front of a bus. In that case, yes these people are the same.

Randomly jaywalking however, doesn't put anyone at risk.
 
#224
#224
SaintBruce said:
I think you're talking about literally walking in front of a bus. In that case, yes these people are the same.

Randomly jaywalking however, doesn't put anyone at risk.
Click to expand...

Sure it does, granted there are ways to minimize the risk but the same could be said for drinking and driving.
 
#225
#225
SaintBruce said:
I think you're talking about literally walking in front of a bus. In that case, yes these people are the same.

Randomly jaywalking however, doesn't put anyone at risk.
Click to expand...

Neither was moving a car 150 feet.

But that doesn't fit your argument.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top