I would love to see Tennessee play:
1)USC(I would love to see Tennessee kick Lame Kiffin's ass)
2)Georgia Tech
3)North Carolina
4)Texas
5)Penn State(Get revenge for the two bowl game beatings)
First I think we need to STOP playing I-AA games. Austin Peay this year and UTC next year is a joke. I know there are some small monetary gains from this as it pertains to the athletic department but my guess is that this can be circumvented with better scheduling.
*UT should play one of MTSU and Memphis each season, every other year on some sort of rotating basis. For example, MTSU at home every other year or a 3x1 where three games are played in Knoxville and one in Nashville (no way in the 'Boro) over a 5-6 year span. We should play Memphis in back-to-back seasons on a continuous, but rotating basis. This would mean we play the Tigers (home-and-home) four times every five years with the open year coming in year three.
*UT should play one OOC game on a home and away basis every year. I think these should be done systematically with a focus on giving UT a presence in a particular part of the country. I think where possible, series I will list these below.
*Mid-Atlantic: Focus schools should be those which produce competitive rivalries that of geographic interest in areas which serve as important recruiting grounds. In my mind these include UVA, U Maryland, UNC, NC St and Georgia Tech and Navy. I think of important note here is Georgia Tech because 1)there is a great historical precedence and most importantly 2) it gives UT a presence in the Atlanta area AWAY from UGA.
*Northeast: These should include Rutgers, Pitt, Syracuse, Army and UConn^. I use a "^" for UConn because I'm not sure they are relevant enough even though we are scheduled to play there in a few seasons. I think the most relevant of these is Rutgers and this is particularly true now that they are in the Big10.
*West coast: UCLA, Cal-Berkley, Oregon, USC. My sense is that we should really focus on reintroducing the historical series with UCLA with the aim of playing four times a decade. I also like the thought of playing Cal-Berkley, not so much USC or Oregon. I'm not qualifying which programs are better I just think Cal and UCLA offer more interesting matchups. Also, we should stay away from trying to play USC just because of that joker Kiffin--he may not be there much longer anyway.
*Notre Dame: We should play Notre Dame 4-6 times every two decades or so.
*Cupcakes: We have to play at least one of these a year but they should FBS schools not IAA/FCS schools. These are your Western KY, South Alabama's, MAC schools etc. Occasionally the AD could bump this up and play Houston, So Miss, Cincinnati or the like but, in reality, if the other schools mentioned above were rotated effectively there would be only an occasional need for this.