05_never_again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 23,992
- Likes
- 21,790
1.) Because GT is a middling program that plays in a high school stadium and is never nationally relevant.
2.) Top to bottom they usually field a team of mediocre talent that is somewhat masked by the fact that they run a gimmicky offense that's very hard to scheme for and as a result, they sneak up on teams that should never lose to them. However I also notice that when good teams get a fair amount of time to scheme for it, they take you apart.
3.) Your defenses are typically garbage. Offenses go through them like an Olympic bobsled team.
I guess that's OK if your goal is upsetting a higher ranked team once in a while. However until I start seeing GT playing in the ACC Championship game or in the playoffs, they will always be an "also-ran" program.
They've actually done that 4 times (2006, 2009, 2012, 2014). They even won the 2009 game, beating a Clemson team with several eventual NFLers on it (including C.J. Spiller), but had to vacate it.
Georgia Tech, especially given their academic requirements, has a totally respectable program. They actually have a more recent national title than Georgia (1990), have some tradition, put some guys in the NFL (including recent superstars like Calvin Johnson and Demaryius Thomas), and generally field respectable, sometimes good, teams. Any team playing them should underestimate them at their own peril (ask Georgia about that the last 4 years).
Do they have a great stadium or facilities? No, but I don't think they are an "also-ran" program either. Is a certain component of their success from a gimmicky system? Perhaps, but wouldn't you do the same thing in their situation?