NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,695
- Likes
- 82,319
Your claiming there's only want it banned or believe it should happen. That's a false choice
incorrect since I can be and am against both. What someone else does isn't me condoning the actionI'm presenting no false choice. My own stance is not in favor of an outright ban on all abortions. Idk if I've ever seen someone be as dishonest as you are right now.
You're saying you don't support forcing your views on women. If that's the case then you would have to say you're okay with it being legal for a woman to abort a heathy child at 9 months without any real reason. To argue against that would be to "force your views on women".
That's not a false choice. That's the obvious choice here. Either you regulate it or you allow everything.
Are you okay with viable kids being aborted? If so, why?
No but I'm also not going to make that choice for anyone else. I'm not going to force my personal beliefs on someone else
About murder? You believe it’s wrong to force your personal beliefs about murder onto people?
We both agree the fetus is viable. It has a heartbeat. And you terminate that?
what you’re saying is we shouldn’t as a society ban murder because it’s a personal belief that shouldn’t be forced on others? That’s absurd
This was the exact discussion. Where is the dishonesty? You posted itIdk if I've ever seen something as dishonest as how you just took what I said out of context to falsely claim I was saying 6 weeks is viable. That message started with me asking you about a viable child. Not a 6 week old child. I then said if a viable child has their heartbeat terminated that it is an act of murder.
No, we don't agree that a 6wk fetus is viable. I'm not sure anyone does.
We can disagree about six weeks
incorrect since I can be and am against both. What someone else does isn't me condoning the action
What if we let the States decide what was reasonable? We might end up with an entire range of solutions.I see locked horns on the debate for eternity. Personally I say ban abortion except for the women that want to take the "next day" pill or women that have a compelling reason due to a major genetic defect, which opens up another can of worms.
Those that fervently believe in the 2A and our constitutional right to bear arms (of which I am one), will never, ever, ever give an inch to those that would seek to restrict gun rights.
The 2A folks know, rightly, that the “other side” has no intention of stopping. Ever.
It’s a similar dynamic with Pro-Choice. The reason they won’t come out and denounce “9 month abortion”. They can’t accept any restriction, at all. They know, rightly, that the “other side” has no intention of stopping. Ever.
I see locked horns on the debate for eternity. Personally I say ban abortion except for the women that want to take the "next day" pill or women that have a compelling reason due to a major genetic defect, which opens up another can of worms.
Those that fervently believe in the 2A and our constitutional right to bear arms (of which I am one), will never, ever, ever give an inch to those that would seek to restrict gun rights.
The 2A folks know, rightly, that the “other side” has no intention of stopping. Ever.
It’s a similar dynamic with Pro-Choice. The reason they won’t come out and denounce “9 month abortion”. They can’t accept any restriction, at all. They know, rightly, that the “other side” has no intention of stopping. Ever.
As much as abhor the practice I don’t want to see it banned completely even as a method of BC.
Agreed. I’m willing to accept anything from 6-12 weeks but I think 6 is the most reasonable given how we define life.
Although a solid argument can also be made at conception based on the definition of life
The bottom line to the abortion rights side is that it's a form of birth control, and probably 95% of all abortions are because someone got pregnant when they didn't want to.