No.
If last week (9/21) taught us anything, we need live action work. Let this awful run game get going. The Oline and RBs need a fire under them. Also Worley needs the most live action work with recievers possible. Open up some passing game and lets get the QB and WRs on the same page.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
SMH....I don't get it. We are averaging 200 yards per game and 5.0 yards per carry. That's better than we have done since 2000!
I have to admit that this was done against WKU, Austin Peay, and even Oregon, and that we struggled a bit against Florida.
But it's misleading IMO....our tailbacks only attempted 17 runs against Florida, and they averaged about 3.3 yards per carry on those...which is about "average" for a running back. Not "awful"...average. I submit that if Peterson had not turned the ball over FOUR STRAIGHT TIMES, we might have established more of a rythm in the first half. In the second half, we got to a point where we pretty much had to throw after the first series or two...but note that on that first series with the FG, we ran the ball well.
I really don't understand the complaints about our run game. It could be BETTER, no doubt, but 200 yards per game is pretty dam good, even against subpar competition. NUMBERS DON'T LIE.
I think that you and others are still having flashbacks to 2011 when we actually only averaged NINETY YARDS PER GAME. It's not 2011 anymore!! We have an above average to good run game!! It's not "awful"!
Some math for you....200 >>>> 90. (if you failed third grade math, I guess you won't get that).
How some fans and posters can seperate themselves from FACTS just amazes me.
:salute: