We'll have to see how this works out for FLA, but in comparisons with the Dooley hire, IMO it's a much bigger risk.
Muschamp has been under the wing of some successful programs, and was in line for Brown's job whenever that time came...but has NO HC experience. Dooley was under Saban for several years, including time at an SEC school for a NC, and the pros. Then was placed in a HC position at a program with little history of success...and did an OK job there, while serving as AD. Both had great mentoring (I personnally am not overly impressed with Brown, but he has won at TX, so will give him that one), but when Dooley was announced as our coach...the overall response by the media and even on this board was negative to mediocre. That was all circumstance and the feeling we had to scramble and/or settle for whoever was available.
Considering the state of the programs when the turnover happened...I'm not sure that FLA made the right move. TN was in desperation mode when we were looking, FLA isn't. I think we landed a gem. I understand the need to get a coach named to save recruits, but I'm not sure that jumping this quickly will serve them well. Muschamp has no experience being "the man", and it will be interesting to see how he handles the whole package at a school that has become spoiled to success. He may be great, but he may struggle trying to work the whole vs just the half. Diamond in the rough, or fools gold?
Time will tell, but this one has the potential to be a Zook repeat. (fingers crossed)
In comparison, Dooley's resume (prior to our hiring him) looks much better than Muschamps.