SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 52,380
- Likes
- 65,050
Yes but the CDC removed liability from the manufacturer in this case everyone knows that. So therefore if you are an employer and force someone to take something where no one will be liable, you absolutely shouldTake on that responsibility
And the reality of that is “yet”. About a month ago the Biden administration already said “the possibility of lowering the employee requirement is “on the table”. They will keep chipping away at the lowest hanging fruit. Next it will be 50 employees. Then 20. Then 10. Then 1. Watch what I tell youThe reality is my wife and I work for large companies and are not forced to vax. If we are then we have options
Racism wasn’t working to divide us. They had to find something else.If nothing else the last five or so pages goes to show just how badly that moron in the WH has disturbed the equilibrium between employer/employee. And I place the Great Resignation squarely on his dumbassery too people are sick and tired of the workplace crap and many of us boomers are just gonna give corporate America the two gun salute and walk away.
One more year… or less if I get really pissed off
That’s normal during emergency incidentsProbably doesn't go here but whatever
Kentucky Amazon worker dies as he’s told to stay put, says girlfriend
So the way to solve a corrupt govt is to fight within the system of the corrupt govt?Yeah, there is. Answers that are as old as libertarian thought....if there is government coercion/force, then we need to oppose it through government channels. If there is no government coercion, then we should not use government channels to oppose it. In either case, we should use market forces if we want to oppose it.