Worst President's First 100 Days in History

#226
#226
Biopsyman said:
Just look at the government should just fix.

These are the facts

1. Worst postrecession job creation and GDP since World War II
2. More individuals on food stamps and welfare benefits doubled under Obama versus bush
3 trillion dollar deficit under Obama
4. Labor participation rate lower since mid 70s under another winter Jimmy Carter.
5 producers has the Obama tax added to the income at 2.8% for program the average person did not save $2500 a year and did not keep their doctor

Police being mowed down.. the president saying the cops in Boston acted stupidly.. hand ups don't shoot never happened according to eye wintnessws

Shall I continue.. game over
Click to expand...

You do understand the model that was implemented had to be one of slow and steady growth, right??? When the bottom falls out, you can't go out and build an economy based on a house of cards, like for instance, the model Reagan implemented in the 80s. Obama didn't have the luxury of using the government to stimulate the economy like Reagan and his military build-up. Obama couldn't do a massive degreg to the financial industry, like Reagan....that's ultimately what caused the stock market crash in 1987. The food stamps issue is ridiculous to mention unless you don't care how stupid it makes you look. Of course, it's likely you have no real clue as to how economic models are formed and implemented
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#228
#228
114VOL said:
You do understand the model that was implemented had to be one of slow and steady growth, right??? When the bottom falls out, you can't go out and build an economy based on a house of cards, like for instance, the model Reagan implemented in the 80s. Obama didn't have the luxury of using the government to stimulate the economy like Reagan and his military build-up. Obama couldn't do a massive degreg to the financial industry, like Reagan....that's ultimately what caused the stock market crash in 1987. The food stamps issue is ridiculous to mention unless you don't care how stupid it makes you look. Of course, it's likely you have no real clue as to how economic models are formed and implemented
Click to expand...

What you say is partially true. However Obama did almost everything he could to stifle economic growth. First he and his minions passed the turd ACA then started delaying implementation. Business can deal with a **** sandwich but knowing they have one coming but not when curbs growth.
 
#229
#229
hog88 said:
What you say is partially true. However Obama did almost everything he could to stifle economic growth. First he and his minions passed the turd ACA then started delaying implementation. Business can deal with a **** sandwich but knowing they have one coming but not when curbs growth.
Click to expand...

Specifically, what did Obama do to stifle growth? If you're going to mention unnecessary regs, please specify which ones by quantifying the result or the lost revenue. Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#230
#230
114VOL said:
Specifically, what did Obama do to stifle growth? If you're going to mention unnecessary regs, please specify which ones by quantifying the result or the lost revenue. Thanks
Click to expand...

I said above, the many starts/stops and delays in implementation of ACA. Which made a terrible law even worse.
 
#231
#231
114VOL said:
You do understand the model that was implemented had to be one of slow and steady growth, right??? When the bottom falls out, you can't go out and build an economy based on a house of cards, like for instance, the model Reagan implemented in the 80s. Obama didn't have the luxury of using the government to stimulate the economy like Reagan and his military build-up. Obama couldn't do a massive degreg to the financial industry, like Reagan....that's ultimately what caused the stock market crash in 1987. The food stamps issue is ridiculous to mention unless you don't care how stupid it makes you look. Of course, it's likely you have no real clue as to how economic models are formed and implemented
Click to expand...

8 years and his plan did not work. He job creation did not keep up with population growth or new entries in the job market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#232
#232
114VOL said:
Specifically, what did Obama do to stifle growth? If you're going to mention unnecessary regs, please specify which ones by quantifying the result or the lost revenue. Thanks
Click to expand...

Dodd-Frank and it's master creation, the CFPB, has hammered community banking and lending in general.
 
#233
#233
114VOL said:
Everything he posted is 100% accurate. Provide something other than buzz words to support your opinion
Click to expand...

I already did..

Why do you think job creation and labor participation rate was so bad during his administration? Don't you think his policies had a direct effect? GDP never got over 3% for a single year
 
#234
#234
GAVol said:
Dodd-Frank and it's master creation, the CFPB, has hammered community banking and lending in general.
Click to expand...

But then in 2001, the SEC had a huge budget cut and couldn't perform the necessary oversight needed to regulate the bond rating agencies and the resulting housing market crash. I am assuming you understand the bad loans themselves didn't crash the market
 
#235
#235
Biopsyman said:
I already did..

Why do you think job creation and labor participation rate was so bad during his administration? Don't you think his policies had a direct effect? GDP never got over 3% for a single year
Click to expand...

I am not saying Obama was any sort of great economic POTUS. He could have done better. Still, there wasn't much that could be done in a responsible manner that could have jump started growth. Like I said, the economic climate was much different in 2008 than it was in 2000
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#236
#236
Biopsyman said:
8 years and his plan did not work. He job creation did not keep up with population growth or new entries in the job market.
Click to expand...

obama's plan worked. his economic policies cause more Americans and illegal aliens to rely on fed gov programs.
 
#237
#237
#241
#241
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#242
#242
Grand Vol said:
Hitler didn't use chemical weapons on the battlefield or over his own cities. Spicer is correct on that account.
Click to expand...

Well like Assad, hitler did use chemical weapons on his own people -hitler used chemical weapons in gas chambers against his own people that were Jewish... so he did neglect that big detail... so I don't know spicer would insenuate that hitler was better than Assad, given that they both technically did use chemical weapons in their own people.

Maybe he should have compared him to hitler, stating that people like Assad are crazy enough to use chemical weapons on their own people like hitler did...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#245
#245
A gas chamber is a chemical weapon that was used in WWII. He is technically incorrect.

If he had said, "Hitler didn't use chemical weapons on the battlefield" he would be technically correct, but there is no point in saying that.

The only reasonable conclusion from Spicer's statement is that he overlooked the whole gas chamber thing. He's a ****ing idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#246
#246
I believe that Hitler was actually a ww1 casualty of mustard gas. He then used Zyklon b on the Jews and other Aryan enemies.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top