Would our government experiment on a group of its citizens even if it meant killing alll number of them?

#127
#127
NurseGoodVol said:
I'm. Not laughing. Our gov is complicit in so many black ops and bioengineered warfare it's not even deniable anymore. The only reason the cdc is so concerned about Ebola entering the country is that it can't be controlled.
We did use our own people to test nuclear weapons, neurological agents and skin agents. Then the gov 40 years later finally fessed up. My microbiology teacher once made a comment, he worked for the cdc before, " you'd never believe the things they're capable of" yes actually, yes i would.
Click to expand...
Dripping with clairvoyance...
 
#128
#128
This ish has gone on for decades, regardless of who is in office. Can it be reigned in? Should it be reigned in? Are we so deep in the rabbit hole we just have to keep eating the mushrooms until we come out the other side?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#129
#129
AshG said:
This ish has gone on for decades, regardless of who is in office. Can it be reigned in? Should it be reigned in? Are we so deep in the rabbit hole we just have to keep eating the mushrooms until we come out the other side?
Click to expand...
You can't be serious asking this.
 
#134
#134
Thunder Good-Oil said:
I have very little doubt that currently there are elements in the government that have contingency plans for thinning the population if necessary. Nobody is going to write memos outlining an actual purpose, but they can "study" diseases and substances with the stated purpose of combating outbreaks (while quietly collecting the knowledge on how to deploy these things).

I think that it's possible in the past, during widely accepted segregation, that specific groups of people had been considered potential targets. In the present it's very possible that the secretive agencies have plans on how to stop a population explosion in case the planet were to no longer have the resources to sustain human life (100 billion people? a trillion people?).

Remember the anthrax attacks? The prime suspects were government workers that had access in the labs that they worked in.

A better question might be... what is the Chinese government up to? What are their strategies for thinning the herd?
Click to expand...
🧐
 
#147
#147
LouderVol said:
You didnt say the last part. But you definitely said the first.
Click to expand...

What I said was that there is a high likelihood that those involved have more information than we do. That is a far cry from saying they know better than us.

I'm sure we'd all reassess our stances if we had full access to all threat vectors and other associated information.
 
#148
#148
AshG said:
What I said was that there is a high likelihood that those involved have more information than we do. That is a far cry from saying they know better than us.

I'm sure we'd all reassess our stances if we had full access to all threat vectors and other associated information.
Click to expand...
So they do know better/more than us, and we should trust their assessments and decision making based on knowledge we dont have.
 
#149
#149
LouderVol said:
So they do know better/more than us, and we should trust their assessments and decision making based on knowledge we dont have.
Click to expand...

Knowing more does not mean knowing better, and I'm unsure why you continue to connect those two words.
 
#150
#150
AshG said:
Knowing more does not mean knowing better, and I'm unsure why you continue to connect those two words.
Click to expand...
Except for the extreme of knowing "everything" and not being able to process it, I dont see how knowing more wouldnt be better.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top