BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
Our recruiting mess has nothing to do with the way Pearl recruited.
We are in this situation because we fired a coach very late in the game.
As I have suggested on numerous occasions, if the decision was to fire Pearl, it should have taken place in September 2010, not this spring. Pearl did the best he could to recruit this season and fill the holes that were coming. Chances are, if he was back Hopson would be too and maybe even Tobias.
If Pearl would have been fired in September, this class could have been salvaged. If Pearl was still coaching, this class could have been salvaged. The way Pearl's firing was handled, and the timing of it are what has resulted in the recruiting mess. If you can't see that maybe you should go away.
Blaming Pearl is the typical babble and garbage I have come to expect from you, lawvol, and the other hatophiles, but it is tired, stale, and boring. Move on and blame something else.
It is laughable that every time an unknown and unheralded player comes along you and the other degenerates jump on Pearl and say it is a result of what he has done. If we'd been able to land a highly ranked prospect this late in the game I doubt any of you would give him any credit for the rise in stature he helped give the program over the last six years.
I rarely post but this one I could not let pass. Most of what you had posted to this point was just a bit silly but that's just plain ....unsmart. Yes pearls recruiting is directly related to the mess we are in. Even if the whole lie-gate never happened and no NCAA choppers were hoovering and Harris stayed we would still be hurting for big men and point guard play just like we have been for pretty much his whole tenure.
Name me one guy he ever developed. Most of the decent guys he brought in never got any better than can be expected from what can be expected from what happens from getting playing time. And most got worse. Harris is actually the exception to the rule and if Hopson had played for any coach with size 12's he would be a 1st round shoo in.
I know Coach Martin knows a lot more about this kid than I do, but I don't like the decision to offer him. Makanjuola may be the rawest prospect we've signed in many years; I doubt if we've ever signed a guy who didn't start for his HS team.
I've turned over a lot of stones looking for info on him, and he barely made a ripple as a senior at Oak Hill.
At Word of God this past season, Makanjuola reportedly averaged 6.7 rebounds per game according to these stats. His name is not listed among Word of God's top 5 scorers and their No. 5 scorer averaged just 5.5 points per game. I clicked on the "Details" of each game in Word of God's schedule, and by my count Makanjuola scored a total of 112 points in the 20 games for which individual scoring was reported.
I'd love to see him make me eat my words, but I really can't see this guy contributing anytime soon. Maybe he can help out some w/ rebounding, which we'll sorely need next year, but offensively...
Pic of Makanjuola from one year ago (at Oak Hill); he's 2nd from the right.
the funny thing is you are actually serious. Lofton and Prince were both talented and played to those talents (when prince was not hurt). Chism had a chip on his shoulder and played that way. None of those guys got appreciably better outside of forseeable year to year improvements thats expected from experience and PT. Hilariously all 3 are prototype pearl players tweeners. Chism had a small forward frame playing the 4. Hopson is too small to play the 3 too slow and not enough handles to play anything else. Prince stayed hurt but never had a position he played everything from 1 to 3 while at UT (fairly well) but never really had a position.How about three?
Chris Lofton, Wayne Chism, JP Prince.
Prince went from uncontrollable liability to a key component of the elite 8 run. Chism went from raw big "depth" backing up Duke Crews to a UT all time great... and Chris Lofton, well...
How about three?
Chris Lofton, Wayne Chism, JP Prince.
Prince went from uncontrollable liability to a key component of the elite 8 run. Chism went from raw big "depth" backing up Duke Crews to a UT all time great... and Chris Lofton, well...
Like who? I love how you throw out unsubstantiated jabs but whine when others do the same. lets give some examples. Me saying I don't follow them as much only means exactly that.... from your posts it is fairly obvious my cursory interest in the mens team has exposed me to a lot more info than your commitment has.I have followed all relevant UT sports (Football and Basketball) for over 25 years and have been and will always support them through thick and thin.You are right, you don't spend much time following the basketball team if you don't think Pearl was in on any big men before he was fired.
Like who? I love how you throw out unsubstantiated jabs but whine when others do the same. lets give some examples. Me saying I don't follow them as much only means exactly that.... from your posts it is fairly obvious my cursory interest in the mens team has exposed me to a lot more info than your commitment has.I have followed all relevant UT sports (Football and Basketball) for over 25 years and have been and will always support them through thick and thin.
I am the type of fan that is more likely to be sporting my Orange after a loss then a win. I watched them during the bad times more than the good (basketball that is). I said he does not develop players you throw out 3 terrible names because all three left UT with a lot of obvious untapped potential. last I checked Chism and Loften are still in D-league and I`can't find anything on Prince since he left UT.
How about three?
Chris Lofton, Wayne Chism, JP Prince.
Prince went from uncontrollable liability to a key component of the elite 8 run. Chism went from raw big "depth" backing up Duke Crews to a UT all time great... and Chris Lofton, well...
Chism had minimal improvement.
I'm sure Bruce taught Lofton how to shoot.
And Prince?
I think saying chism improved minimally is crazy. Lofton didnt have problems shooting it was getting open and driving to the bucket. Both he improved at. Now whether the players made this improvement on their own or from their coaches debate away, but give the players credit where its deserved.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
No. Hat's good at what he does and when he "One Ups" people instead of realizing that they go off defeated, like a dog with feelings hurt and it's tail stuck between his legs. It's a big man's world, you either sink or swim. Get use to it.you are confusing hat being in the know with movers and shakers with hatvol's personal opinions.
Chism had minimal improvement.
I'm sure Bruce taught Lofton how to shoot.
And Prince?
I will have to disagree on this one. I saw Chism play from his freshman year in high school to when he finished here. He improved a lot at UT, especially between his freshman and sophomore years.
I would have said you were crazy if you would have told me he would have had a better college career than Willie Kemp their senior year in high school.
Of course he's going to dramatically improve from 14 to 22.
Love Wayne, but as a senior he still had mental lapses, still took wild three point shots, still had up and down games.