bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,168
- Likes
- 50,439
On January 12, 2012:
Record: 8-8
SEC Record: 1-1
RPI: 200
Good Wins: 1
Bad Losses: 3
On January 12, 2013:
Record: 8-6
SEC Record: 0-2
RPI: 99
Good Wins: 1
Bad Losses: 1
On January 12, 2014:
Record: 10-5
SEC Record: 1-1
RPI: 54
Good Wins: 2
Bad Losses: 2
I would hardly consider that to be the same, we are in a better position than the previous 2 years, even after last night.
Looking back at last years schedule up to January12, it looks tougher than this years, wouldn't you say? We had the same Wichita State, UVA, Xavier, but also added Georgetown, Memphis, and Okie St. That's pretty stiff.
Oh I agree, you gotta win some. I think the frustration is that our record is marginally better (really the Tusculum game shouldn't be included to make the comparison fair) at 9-5 vs. 8-6 last year. And our schedule to this point last year was harder.
Most people, and probably even yourself, would have thought we were going to be more than one game better than last years team at this point with the talent we've got.
Say wha?
On January 12, 2012:
Record: 8-8
SEC Record: 1-1
RPI: 200
Good Wins: 1
Bad Losses: 3
On January 12, 2013:
Record: 8-6
SEC Record: 0-2
RPI: 99
Good Wins: 1
Bad Losses: 1
On January 12, 2014:
Record: 10-5
SEC Record: 1-1
RPI: 54
Good Wins: 2
Bad Losses: 2
I would hardly consider that to be the same, we are in a better position than the previous 2 years, even after last night.
Wins and losses, good wins, bad losses. We are really 9-5 and that isn't much different than the last two years.