I like you, but know where near as much as you like yourself. You think you know more than any of the coaches and everything you post is the gospel. Let's let the professional coaching staff that we have do what they feel is right. The SEC is a little different from level that you coached at. Before you say it, WE ALL KNOW you've coached college level players , but you've never coached against SEC level coaches. My rant is over, have a nice evening. GBO!I am 64 years old and played a full-ccourt full game yesterday with teens and 20 year olds AFTER my workout! . . (scored four of our 15)
;o)
depth is not needed for a single game unless the foe is already at a disadvantage.
This is being proven by our 3 win 5 loss SEC record
If we are to succeed we will have to be able to get our girls to go 100 MPH every second of every play and that ain't happening right now. The only way that 5in5out is an advantage is if you push your competition to a tired level
Also we are going to have to give more time for continuity,,,in one of our recent games a 5 in 5 out happened after only 46 seconds (that is ridiculous)...If we don't start giving them at least a minute or two to learn each other's tendencies...THIS will not work
Some of you will take this a me being a negavol
and that is anything but true
I think Kim has a good system and it WILL work, but only if subbing isn't done as it is being done,,,it has to be done with purpose, not by schedule,,,if we keep doing it so fast, we WILL frustrate our players instead of our opponents
Where do you think those SEC teams get their players?I like you, but know where near as much as you like yourself. You think you know more than any of the coaches and everything you post is the gospel. Let's let the professional coaching staff that we have do what they feel is right. The SEC is a little different from level that you coached at. Before you say it, WE ALL KNOW you've coached college level players , but you've never coached against SEC level coaches. My rant is over, have a nice evening. GBO!
I agree with this 100%I am 64 years old and played a full-ccourt full game yesterday with teens and 20 year olds AFTER my workout! . . (scored four of our 15)
;o)
depth is not needed for a single game unless the foe is already at a disadvantage.
This is being proven by our 3 win 5 loss SEC record
If we are to succeed we will have to be able to get our girls to go 100 MPH every second of every play and that ain't happening right now. The only way that 5in5out is an advantage is if you push your competition to a tired level
Also we are going to have to give more time for continuity,,,in one of our recent games a 5 in 5 out happened after only 46 seconds (that is ridiculous)...If we don't start giving them at least a minute or two to learn each other's tendencies...THIS will not work
Some of you will take this a me being a negavol
and that is anything but true
I think Kim has a good system and it WILL work, but only if subbing isn't done as it is being done,,,it has to be done with purpose, not by schedule,,,if we keep doing it so fast, we WILL frustrate our players instead of our opponents
I think Kim thinks it WON'T work without the fresh legs brought about by the hockey line subbing. That may be increasingly true as we get deeper into the season and esp in tourney format. I agree it's disruptive and at time frustrating forr the players. It may be a conflict inherient in the system. Also the reason more programs don't try this system.I think Kim has a good system and it WILL work, but only if subbing isn't done as it is being done,,,it has to be done with purpose, not by schedule,,,if we keep doing it so fast, we WILL frustrate our players instead of our opponents
Got to be very lucky to get into the top 4 . More realistic would be 6 or 7 seed . Our schedule gets a little better 2nd half but we should have never lost the Oklahoma or Vandy game. The LSU game slipped through our fingers. Now we have to take care of business rest of the season and do well in the tournament to get top 16 seeding. Going far in the tournament is risky because it doesn't give you much rest for the big dance. The men's team have made better showings by going out early in the SEC tournament. GLVUpdated SEC standings after last night. Big games Sunday Ole Miss/Vandy and KY/OK. Helps us for either Vandy or OM to take a loss; really need KY to drop one.
![]()
Standings - Women's Basketball - Southeastern Conference
Comprehensive coverage of SEC football, basketball, baseball and more, including live games, scores, schedules, standings and newswww.secsports.com
I disagree with your first paragraph and agree with the second.Regardless of the system not playing with a sense of urgency for 40 minutes. Not playing smart for forty minutes. Not working for the best shot for 40 minutes. We play like South Carolina for about 25 minutes every game and Georgia the other 15. So at this point in the season this team has underacheived their talent. Just 8 or 10 minutes a game we can't keep it together and play effective basketball. Were a more talented team than Vanderbilt and Oklahoma. We should've won at home against LSU. We've let three SEC game slip through our hands and were at the point where were ruining a very promising season if we don't get it together in this stretch run. Coach Kim knows what it takes she hasn't been able to get it out of them. Another week off to get better we'll see where we are Sunday.
As far as the substitution pattern I think Coach will learn that is probably to extreme for the SEC. I can see subs at the three minute mark less than a minute has never made any sense to me. Any player should be able to go hard for three minutes that is like three possessions per team and no more than six if your shooting every fifteen seconds. I mean you could go 3-3-2-2 that is still 20 minutes a player. Actually some players are pushing thirty a game so it makes sense for them to play longer stretches and rest longer stretches.
Big difference, the women have an extra week off after their tourney while the men are playing theirs. Still though, if we end up playing 3 or 4 straight in the tourney that's big cumulative wear and tear in this intense system. Tired legs are def something we have to look out for.Going far in the tournament is risky because it doesn't give you much rest for the big dance. The men's team have made better showings by going out early in the SEC tournament. GLV
We play at one level for 25 minutes per game and a completely different level the other 15. Spearman, Boyd, Hollingshead were ranked in the 30's in their hoopgurlz classes. Puckett was 43. Spencer no ranking and Spear and Latham top 100 but a little lower. Darby was a four star not quite in the top 100. Cooper and Whitehorn top 15 players. I see a really quick explosive team that doesn't play as a team all of the game and plays out of control 20 possessions per games. Not saying we should be undefeated in the SEC but we have more AA's than Vandy or Oklahoma so those two have to be considered underacheiving. SC, Texas, and LSU have more talent. Other than those three no one in the SEC does.I disagree with your first paragraph and agree with the second.
I'm not sure we've underplayed our talent. There's the seniors who never really had the physical talent level for this system. There's uber talent like Coop and Ruby but they're young (esp Coop) and raw at SEC level. Then there's the transfers like Zee and Latham who are still teetering on the edge of how actually talented they are at this level, esp in terms of consistent focus and concentration. All loaded with potential but I'm not sure it was ever reasonable to expect it all to come together so soon. Even so, it definitely could still happen this year. And for sure the talent upgrade next yr should turn the corner.
Agree completely about the subbing, esp the 1 min subbing. That looks suspiciously like doing it just cuz I said I'd do it. And obviously, it's really hurting our vet shooters who need rhythm. Totally agree if they're already going to play 30, let them do it in longer stretches. But I doubt they back off of it, esp next year.
We play at one level for 25 minutes per game and a completely different level the other 15. Spearman, Boyd, Hollingshead were ranked in the 30's in their hoopgurlz classes. Puckett was 43. Spencer no ranking and Spear and Latham top 100 but a little lower. Darby was a four star not quite in the top 100. Cooper and Whitehorn top 15 players. I see a really quick explosive team that doesn't play as a team all of the game and plays out of control 20 possessions per games. Not saying we should be undefeated in the SEC but we have more AA's than Vandy or Oklahoma so those two have to be considered underacheiving. SC, Texas, and LSU have more talent. Other than those three no one in the SEC does.
We have our chance at LSU big game for us and one we need to win.I agree. Tennessee has better talent than Oklahoma and Vanderbilt.
The shortcomings so far this season are mainly due to in only 20 games there’s a lack of chemistry playing together.
I don’t think there’s as wide a gap in terms of talent between Tennessee, LSU, and Texas.
Those teams have proven veteran coaching staffs and some players experienced in their system for multiple seasons.
I think in a second matchup Tennessee could certainly defeat any of the teams they have loss to this season.
Regardless of the system not playing with a sense of urgency for 40 minutes. Not playing smart for forty minutes. Not working for the best shot for 40 minutes. We play like South Carolina for about 25 minutes every game and Georgia the other 15. So at this point in the season this team has underacheived their talent. Just 8 or 10 minutes a game we can't keep it together and play effective basketball. Were a more talented team than Vanderbilt and Oklahoma. We should've won at home against LSU. We've let three SEC game slip through our hands and were at the point where were ruining a very promising season if we don't get it together in this stretch run. Coach Kim knows what it takes she hasn't been able to get it out of them. Another week off to get better we'll see where we are Sunday.
As far as the substitution pattern I think Coach will learn that is probably to extreme for the SEC. I can see subs at the three minute mark less than a minute has never made any sense to me. Any player should be able to go hard for three minutes that is like three possessions per team and no more than six if your shooting every fifteen seconds. I mean you could go 3-3-2-2 that is still 20 minutes a player. Actually some players are pushing thirty a game so it makes sense for them to play longer stretches and rest longer stretches.
the thing is this type of system depends on two things,,out-endurancing and volume shooting....but,,,once you get into the upper echelons of the NCAA teams,,,pretty much all of them have depth and athletes to match us,,,it is then that volume shooting and scoring comes into play and 3 for 26 shooting threes will kill us every timeI think Kim thinks it WON'T work without the fresh legs brought about by the hockey line subbing. That may be increasingly true as we get deeper into the season and esp in tourney format. I agree it's disruptive and at time frustrating forr the players. It may be a conflict inherient in the system. Also the reason more programs don't try this system.
Exactly and it is time to get it going still can have a really great season. We have to play for 40 minutes and we can go far this season and in the NCAAI think what's most frustrating most of us is that we have seen Tennessee, in quite a few several-minute stretches and a few quarters here and there, looking truly special. In those moments they look like a top-5 team.
As Pat used to say to her teams, "Be careful what you show me."
That this team has shown, several times this season, that they are capable of maintaining intense focus and have the talent to compete at a super-high level but not consistently, is what's maddening. Once they showed us they CAN do it, but then too often DON'T, is what brings out the worst in a lot of forum posters.
I'd still like to think the staff might do well to try to find out from the players themselves where and why they think the disconnect happens. I mean, what do they think are the reasons for all the Jekyll/Hyde-ing? Fatigue? Confusion? Waxing and waning confidence? Fear of fouling? Paralyzing fear of failure?
If ever the Lady Vols were to start consistently putting together 30-40 minutes in games as the best of what they've already shown they can be for 5-10, they'll be more than capable of winning championships.
Not just a loss to SC should be a loss to anybody. Spencer after a great start has been in a slump, Jewel comes and goes game to game same for Darby, Puckett has never found it this season. Everybody else should be looking mid-range and driving the basket.the thing is this type of system depends on two things,,out-endurancing and volume shooting....but,,,once you get into the upper echelons of the NCAA teams,,,pretty much all of them have depth and athletes to match us,,,it is then that volume shooting and scoring comes into play and 3 for 26 shooting threes will kill us every time
I am 64 years old and played a full-ccourt full game yesterday with teens and 20 year olds AFTER my workout! . . (scored four of our 15)
;o)
depth is not needed for a single game unless the foe is already at a disadvantage.
This is being proven by our 3 win 5 loss SEC record
If we are to succeed we will have to be able to get our girls to go 100 MPH every second of every play and that ain't happening right now. The only way that 5in5out is an advantage is if you push your competition to a tired level
Also we are going to have to give more time for continuity,,,in one of our recent games a 5 in 5 out happened after only 46 seconds (that is ridiculous)...If we don't start giving them at least a minute or two to learn each other's tendencies...THIS will not work
Some of you will take this a me being a negavol
and that is anything but true
I think Kim has a good system and it WILL work, but only if subbing isn't done as it is being done,,,it has to be done with purpose, not by schedule,,,if we keep doing it so fast, we WILL frustrate our players instead of our opponents
I just think this is normal and true of every team that's mid to good and not just obviously awful. Many teams have flashes of what they could be. Everyone wishes they could be that team all the time. Hopefully for us it's a stage of growth.I think what's most frustrating most of us is that we have seen Tennessee, in quite a few several-minute stretches and a few quarters here and there, looking truly special. In those moments they look like a top-5 team.
As Pat used to say to her teams, "Be careful what you show me."
That this team has shown, several times this season, that they are capable of maintaining intense focus and have the talent to compete at a super-high level but not consistently, is what's maddening. Once they showed us they CAN do it, but then too often DON'T, is what brings out the worst in a lot of forum posters.
I'd still like to think the staff might do well to try to find out from the players themselves where and why they think the disconnect happens. I mean, what do they think are the reasons for all the Jekyll/Hyde-ing? Fatigue? Confusion? Waxing and waning confidence? Fear of fouling? Paralyzing fear of failure?
If ever the Lady Vols were to start consistently putting together 30-40 minutes in games as the best of what they've already shown they can be for 5-10, they'll be more than capable of winning championships.
A part of me thinks if we can even manage to bring it for 30 it *may* be enough -- IF we build enough of a lead in those 30. My biggest fear is that the 1.5 minute subbing is causing "battery memory" in our players' legs and that they'll crash and burn if suddenly asked to do more now. And giving the shooters a bit more time before subbing may be what needs to happen, so we'll see.Exactly and it is time to get it going still can have a really great season. We have to play for 40 minutes and we can go far this season and in the NCAA
it comes with knowing and reading your personnel...coaches and players!I just think this is normal and true of every team that's mid to good and not just obviously awful. Many teams have flashes of what they could be. Everyone wishes they could be that team all the time. Hopefully for us it's a stage of growth.
Being able to play at a high skill level and consistently execute game plan and maintain confidence, poise and focus throughout the game is what separates So Carolina and the rest of us. It seems to be built into rare top notch talent which is why Joyce Edwards already has it. Maybe it comes with confidence in your physical talent. Most struggle for it and get there to varying degrees and it's the coach's hardest job.