1/5 of Gen Z (1997-2004) identify as LGBT.

What is "gay"? is it the sexual attraction to same sex? because the difference between attraction and actually getting it on with someone is a vast chasm. So "turning someone gay" means what exactly? Everyone still choses whether or not to have sex with someone (barring rape). People have sex frequently enough without attraction. Gals out gold digging, guys just needing to empty the sack. Point is, gay isnt an attraction its an action and that is a choice that can be highly influenced but I don't see how you can "turn" someone to commit a sexual act.

You have utilized a non sequitor in your example.
 
I'm still waiting for the study that shows us the inborn gay gene.
Over 98% of the human genome is believed to be “empty”. We don’t know what it does. It’s currently referred to as “junk DNA”.

I have no idea if there is an “inborn gay gene” embedded somewhere in all of that “empty” code.

But I have a difficult time believing that 98% of the human genetic code does absolutely nothing at all - we just don’t have the technology to understand it. Jmo.
 
Yes. I believe it is much more likely one commits a violent crime due to relationships than it is to change their sexuality.

You think it is more possible someone would kill another human to gain acceptance into a group vs become a homosexual? Not only do I disagree but I have seen evidence of this.
 
There have already been a few college professors going down this road.. UT started with the he/she/zee stuff about five years ago.. I bet we are about five years off

None of which has anything to do with pedophilia. It is a dishonest tactic used by those with weak arguments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcbvol
Over 98% of the human genome is believed to be “empty”. We don’t know what it does. It’s currently referred to as “junk DNA”.

I have no idea if there is an “inborn gay gene” embedded somewhere in all of that “empty” code.

But I have a difficult time believing that 98% of the human genetic code does absolutely nothing at all - we just don’t have the technology to understand it. Jmo.

It's the alien gene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol
You think it is more possible someone would kill another human to gain acceptance into a group vs become a homosexual? Not only do I disagree but I have seen evidence of this.

still trying to argue gay is a lifestyle choice, I see.
 
None of which has anything to do with pedophilia. It is a dishonest tactic used by those with weak arguments.
The professors talking about pedophilia as something we could even consider as something not disgusting, is completely relevant.. the he/she dumbass crap is just a litmus test of how far off the rails we have started to go.. and I don’t see it righting itself.. and if you say ‘sHoW me tHe pRoOf’.. you will be in my poo poo list.. I don’t collect crap like that lol
 
40 years ago the US allowed the nude photographs of a prepubescent girl to be published in a sex magazine. I would say the needle hasn't moved like you forecasted.

You are just using fear mongering regarding LBGTQ issues and trying to spread the taint. It is a despicable tactic.

Well, it used to just be G's many years ago, then the B's joined in a few years later and now the T's have gained acceptance...so to act like there hasn't been a slippery slope is either disingenuous on your part or just out right lying. If you think "muh consent" is going to stop the P's from joining the weirdo alphabet soup, you're shortsighted.
 
CHILDREN ARE INCAPABLE OF CONSENT.
Damn right. Children, under no circumstance, can consent to sexual activity.

I, personally, am also of the opinion that children cannot consent to sexual re-assignment - even with a signed note from their parents.

Jmo.
 
What is "gay"? is it the sexual attraction to same sex? because the difference between attraction and actually getting it on with someone is a vast chasm. So "turning someone gay" means what exactly? Everyone still choses whether or not to have sex with someone (barring rape). People have sex frequently enough without attraction. Gals out gold digging, guys just needing to empty the sack. Point is, gay isnt an attraction its an action and that is a choice that can be highly influenced but I don't see how you can "turn" someone to commit a sexual act.
I disagree on sexual attraction and feel it is innate. It's not perfect, but I use the Kinsey scale as an example. 0 is full heterosexual and 6 is full homosexual, with 1-5 making up the folks somewhere between. I'm a full 6 and would wager you're a full 0. I don't believe those positions can be changed.

To your point on action, I agree. I feel that's the only conscious choice when it comes to sexuality.
 
You think it is more possible someone would kill another human to gain acceptance into a group vs become a homosexual? Not only do I disagree but I have seen evidence of this.
100%. Now, if we're talking only a homosexual act it's a different answer. If we're talking actually changing one's sexuality my answer remains the same. Sexuality is innate. Violent acts are decisions.
 
How did that make any sense? Not getting pregnant is your proof?

Why is it the Creator made it so only a biological male and biological female can reproduce? Why weren't we created to procreate through the same sex or even asexual?
 
Groups like NMBLA have been trying to weasel their way into the LGBTQ community for some time and have always been roundly rejected. It's not getting any closer to acceptance. It's detestable and criminal.
 

VN Store



Back
Top