'11 FL RB Andrew Buie

Oh look a this, another Devrin Young/Star debate thread. Lol'in at anyone who thinks we wouldn't ake a commitment form Buie or we took DY over Buie. :lol:

We wouldn't take a commitment from Buie. Lane and then Milton are our top 2 on the board.
 
But did Fortenberry actually say/type out that we wouldn't take a commitment from Buie?

So you are suggesting that we would take a commitment from the 3rd RB on our board over two guys who we are in the top 2-3 for? I'm sure you could use some common sense to get to your answer. If we strike out on Lane and Milton then we possibly could, but more than likely at this point we get Lane.
 
So you are suggesting that we would take a commitment from the 3rd RB on our board over two guys who we are in the top 2-3 for? I'm sure you could use some common sense to get to your answer. If we strike out on Lane and Milton then we possibly could, but more than likely at this point we get Lane.

You are the one that said we wouldn't take a commitment from Buie and then implied that Fortenberry said we wouldn't. I'm just asking you if he actually said that.
 
You are the one that said we wouldn't take a commitment from Buie and then implied that Fortenberry said we wouldn't. I'm just asking you if he actually said that.

Let me slow it down for you.

Lane and Milton are our top 2 RBs on the board.

We are in the thick of it for both RBs.

We like both RBs better.

Since we are in the thick of it for both RBs, we will not be taking Buie's commitment right now.

If we strike out on both of them, we might take Buie's commitment. But the staff has shown that they aren't as high on Buie as many on here think they should be. LV in the DY thread said that we essentially took DY over Buie.

Does this help?
 
Let me slow it down for you.

Lane and Milton are our top 2 RBs on the board.

We are in the thick of it for both RBs.

We like both RBs better.

Since we are in the thick of it for both RBs, we will not be taking Buie's commitment right now.

If we strike out on both of them, we might take Buie's commitment. But the staff has shown that they aren't as high on Buie as many on here think they should be. LV in the DY thread said that we essentially took DY over Buie.

Does this help?

Are you going to come out and directly answer my question or not? And I'd like a link to this board of Buie being ranked behind Milton. Since I apparently missed it.
 
I really don't know what the staff sees with Milton. Buie is gonna be a player wherever he goes. He should be above Milton imo.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
It's ok I got this. "No Fortenberry never said we wouldn't take a commitment from Buie". That is the phrase I believe you are looking for.
 
I really don't know what the staff sees with Milton. Buie is gonna be a player wherever he goes. He should be above Milton imo.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

That's the thing. There's a reason they're coaching and there's a reason we're sitting and watching them coach. They know way better than we do. There's no guarantees that anybody will be a player at this point.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
It's ok I got this. "No Fortenberry never said we wouldn't take a commitment from Buie". That is the phrase I believe you are looking for.

No I said that Fortenberry told us how our recruiting board is shaping up. As a matter of fact, he didn't even mention Buie as I just went and looked. He said Lane, Milton, then Romar, and whoever else.

The phrase I am looking for is you obviously have no clue in what you are talking about in looking at your previous posts.
 
No I said that Fortenberry told us how our recruiting board is shaping up. As a matter of fact, he didn't even mention Buie as I just went and looked. He said Lane, Milton, then Romar, and whoever else.

The phrase I am looking for is you obviously have no clue in what you are talking about in looking at your previous posts.
in other words, we might not have a shot with him. That doesn't imply that we wouldn't take a commit from him now does it? Nice strategy, if you can't definitively prove your statement then try to insult my intelligence.
 
Last edited:
Yup, let's take Andrew Buie, a guy with offers from: West Virginia, Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, Pittsburgh, and South Carolina, and was recruited by Georgia and Florida over Devrin Young who had one offer from a BCS school in Stanford. I like where this is going. Not too mention Buie is 5'9/190 while Young is 5'7/160.
 
Yup, let's take Andrew Buie, a guy with offers from: West Virginia, Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, Pittsburgh, and South Carolina, and was recruited by Georgia and Florida over Devrin Young who had one offer from a BCS school in Stanford. I like where this is going. Not too mention Buie is 5'9/190 while Young is 5'7/160.

Take it up with the coaching staff. I trust their judgment.
 
in other words, we might not have a shot with him. That doesn't imply that we wouldn't take a commit from him now does it? Nice strategy, if you can't definitively prove your statement then try to insult my intelligence.

We might not have a shot with him? Go to bed.
 
No I said that Fortenberry told us how our recruiting board is shaping up. As a matter of fact, he didn't even mention Buie as I just went and looked. He said Lane, Milton, then Romar, and whoever else.

The phrase I am looking for is you obviously have no clue in what you are talking about in looking at your previous posts.

The staff is pretty much tight lipped.... Just saying...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 

VN Store



Back
Top