'11 MI RB Justice Hayes

#677
#677
RichRollin said:
And what would be your reasoning? Yeah he has more offers, by big ten teams. He's ranked higher, but I just think this might be one they are missing on. His video to me isn't overwhelming. Don't get me wrong, dude is good. But I don't see with him what I see with other backs, even if they are ranked lower or have less offers. Perhaps the DY/Hayes could be put to rest at this point being that DY will probably be used all over the field. But Hayes (IMO) isn't in the same league with Bellamy or Bigelow. And I don't see that one step plant, hit the hole thing with him. He seems to have a little stutter step before cuts. Once again, my opinion. Perhaps we can debate this and see each others viewpoint respectfully. The dude from Michigan almost went Bin Laden on me earlier, LOL.
Click to expand...

So - Michigan, Michigan State, Notre Dame, Tennessee, Iowa, and Wisconsin are all overrating him?
 
#678
#678
RichRollin said:
And what would be your reasoning? Yeah he has more offers, by big ten teams. He's ranked higher, but I just think this might be one they are missing on. His video to me isn't overwhelming. Don't get me wrong, dude is good. But I don't see with him what I see with other backs, even if they are ranked lower or have less offers. Perhaps the DY/Hayes could be put to rest at this point being that DY will probably be used all over the field. But Hayes (IMO) isn't in the same league with Bellamy or Bigelow. And I don't see that one step plant, hit the hole thing with him. He seems to have a little stutter step before cuts. Once again, my opinion. Perhaps we can debate this and see each others viewpoint respectfully. The dude from Michigan almost went Bin Laden on me earlier, LOL.
Click to expand...

We are not going to get Bellamy or Bigelow. DY is not a RB. Hayes is a big time RB and UT will be happy to take him.
 
#680
#680
RichRollin said:
And what would be your reasoning? Yeah he has more offers, by big ten teams. He's ranked higher, but I just think this might be one they are missing on. His video to me isn't overwhelming. Don't get me wrong, dude is good. But I don't see with him what I see with other backs, even if they are ranked lower or have less offers. Perhaps the DY/Hayes could be put to rest at this point being that DY will probably be used all over the field. But Hayes (IMO) isn't in the same league with Bellamy or Bigelow. And I don't see that one step plant, hit the hole thing with him. He seems to have a little stutter step before cuts. Once again, my opinion. Perhaps we can debate this and see each others viewpoint respectfully. The dude from Michigan almost went Bin Laden on me earlier, LOL.
Click to expand...

Big Ten offers are better than what DY has and there are some great running backs on Big Ten teams, but your right this shouldn't even be an argument since DY and Hayes are different players that will be used in different roles.
 
#684
#684
LV I know you said you would take Hayes commit and I agree. I would like to know would you take Smith and Hayes and be done or would you take Hayes and maybe Bigelow. Which combo do you prefer.
 
#685
#685
hugevolfan24 said:
LOL at you for thinking that a good scat back does not need at least have the ability to pull away from the cometition in high school
Click to expand...

I can't understand the point you are arguing. We are not going to get Bellamy or Bigelow. Young is not a RB. Do you want us to pass on Hayes and take some lower rated?
 
#696
#696
Lord Vader said:
We are not going to get Bellamy or Bigelow. DY is not a RB. Hayes is a big time RB and UT will be happy to take him.
Click to expand...

Well I pretty much agree that DY will not be a RB, it's in my post. As for Bigelow, Bellamy it is what it is. But I guess the main thing I kept hearing was that we were looking for a homerun hitter, speed type back. Hayes to me looks like a good solid back, just not the big homerun guy at the SEC level. Perhaps I was confused on the type of back we were looking for. IDK, But I stand by my opinion, don't take it personal.
 
#698
#698
Thanks, gents :hi:

Weren't we the only non-Big 10 team that he was looking at?
 
#700
#700
RichRollin said:
Well I pretty much agree that DY will not be a RB, it's in my post. As for Bigelow, Bellamy it is what it is. But I guess the main thing I kept hearing was that we were looking for a homerun hitter, speed type back. Hayes to me looks like a good solid back, just not the big homerun guy at the SEC level. Perhaps I was confused on the type of back we were looking for. IDK, But I stand by my opinion, don't take it personal.
Click to expand...

He is exactly what we are looking for- a speed type, homerun hitter who can do big things in space.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top