ericberry4heisman
Certified OG
- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,118
- Likes
- 784
quite possibly but for now lewan is rated #2 while, i keep hearing tiny but i don't know his real name so i'm going with the first UT tackle on the list, is #14 for the 2014 draft. even clowney said lewan was the best tackle he's played against.
quite possibly but for now lewan is rated #2 while, i keep hearing tiny but i don't know his real name so i'm going with the first UT tackle on the list, is #14 for the 2014 draft. even clowney said lewan was the best tackle he's played against.
"He's pretty good," Clowney said of Lewan. "Him and the guy from Tennessee (Antonio 'Tiny' Richardson), best (tackles) I went against
Actually, this is what Clowney said:
quite possibly but for now lewan is rated #2 while, i keep hearing tiny but i don't know his real name so i'm going with the first UT tackle on the list, is #14 for the 2014 draft. even clowney said lewan was the best tackle he's played against.
Clowney has praised Tiny many times this year. Everytime it comes up, he mentions Tiny. The argument doesn't really matter though, they're both very good tackles.
Tiny just a sophomore and first year starter though
Tiny's already a beast and his potential has just barely been tapped. If the new coaches are any good, Tiny could develop into an all-time great. He's the Reggie White of the offensive line. The young man is unbelievable.
Back to DG, is he a signing day commit, or does he plan on announcing before that?
something i wondered about that i'd like to get an opinion on around here, does the departure of bray, hunter, CP, and, two more WRs was it? hurt things any? i don't know what the depth chart looks like at those positions now so what does losing 5 offensive skill position players affect things for green? is there enough there to have roughly the same passing output without those guys?
something i wondered about that i'd like to get an opinion on around here, does the departure of bray, hunter, CP, and, two more WRs was it? hurt things any? i don't know what the depth chart looks like at those positions now so what does losing 5 offensive skill position players affect things for green? is there enough there to have roughly the same passing output without those guys?
We still have some very talented, but unproven players behind those two. Also, it helps our situation with Marquez North who didn't want to come in and sit behind these two. Sure it hurts to lose those guys, but it never hurts to see players getting drafted. I think Bray would have benefited from staying under CBJ one more year, but I wish him the best.
All that being said I don't believe it hurts our situation with D Green. He's not afraid of competition, and with the recent loss of a few players we have plenty of room to bring guys in. That, and the mainstay is the strength of our offensive line, but you already know that :good!:. He'll be running behind a couple of future NFL players here, and maybe more depending on how Mahoney coaches them up.
there are obviously talented players there to fill those spots or they wouldn't be there but i guess the more direct question is would the offense have to rely too heavily on the RB because the passing game might be so-so or would it be good enough to go 50-50 run v pass
You saying if green thinks the offense will have to rely on the run heavily that would be a bad thing for tenn??
something i wondered about that i'd like to get an opinion on around here, does the departure of bray, hunter, CP, and, two more WRs was it? hurt things any? i don't know what the depth chart looks like at those positions now so what does losing 5 offensive skill position players affect things for green? is there enough there to have roughly the same passing output without those guys?