Burger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Messages
- 14,330
- Likes
- 5,281
No doubt, but saying we shouldn't take a guy we see as valuable to the team because he isn't an EE isn't the way to handle it. I could probably do some digging and find some other cases that worked out well.Nope. We got very lucky with CP. He would of been a lot better if he was.
Disagree.
A Linebacker is a linebacker. Especially an up the field pass rushing type like Weatherd.
He could show up the day before camp and if he is physically ready there will be little holding him back play book wise.
When the talent is there, Pressuring the QB is the easiest transition from each level of football
Finally... Someone who isn't ready to write him off because he is getting here a bit late.
He could still be a huge player, if he has the talent
If he gets in, he can be a HUGE ready to go asset to the team. He is SEC ready unlike many of the freshmen could be. He may need a little time to get into shape, but he should be ready to play at least part time. He should know the playbook enough to play right away.
Are we really assuming this guy isn't able to run laps or stay in decent shape unless he is enrolled? C'mon. I understand there may be a learning curve with regards to the playbook, but it is not that far fetched to think he is still working out.
Agree. While I realize there is a difference between JUCO or working out on your own vs. an SEC program, what's the point in sitting here speculating on something about which nobody has any clue? I choose to let the coaches worry about his condition if/when he gets cleared.
::Insert kermit the frog meme:: - But thats none of my business
It would financially be like MLB...and it will suck gigantic donkey ****.
The MLB is doing great. It'd put the NCAA where it deserves to be... Dead.
Paying college athletes will be the last straw for me. We already have pro ball and it's a better product top to bottom.I don't think you understand what I meant by this...The financial inequities of MLB favor the haves over the have nots. CFB will be in the exact same position. Do you really want to get in bidding wars over HS football players? Our AD is already in a precarious position. You folks that favor paying players have not really thought all this through. It will absolutely destroy College athletics.
Paying college athletes will be the last straw for me. We already have pro ball and it's a better product top to bottom.
If athletes are paid it would have to be a stipend distributed directly through the NCAA. And it should be a conservative. amount.
I'm a bit of a college sports socialist. College coaches are over paid, and tickets are over priced. I gave up season tickets when Hamilton started trying to extort us for a high end south end zone upgrade that fell flat on its face when the economy tanked. I've been to one game in eight years and honestly, I don't miss it that much.
I'm sickened by what has happened to college ball and Saban is the poster child for everything that is wrong.
In my opinion college coaches shouldn't make over $500k, and profits should be returned to the schools. Schools should be capped on what they can spend on facilities. The facilities at UT and Oregon (among others) are obscene and I'm not convinced it makes that much better of an athlete. NFL team facilities fall short in comparison because they don't have to recruit. Yet, the players are well conditioned.
The pageantry of college football is guys suiting up in dingy locker rooms under the stadium, not getting mani-pedis before the game in the training room. It's freaking ridiculous. Sadly, fans will continue to buy the tickets and apparel until they destroy this thing.
Paying college athletes will be the last straw for me. We already have pro ball and it's a better product top to bottom.
If athletes are paid it would have to be a stipend distributed directly through the NCAA. And it should be a conservative. amount.
I'm a bit of a college sports socialist. College coaches are over paid, and tickets are over priced. I gave up season tickets when Hamilton started trying to extort us for a high end south end zone upgrade that fell flat on its face when the economy tanked. I've been to one game in eight years and honestly, I don't miss it that much.
I'm sickened by what has happened to college ball and Saban is the poster child for everything that is wrong.
In my opinion college coaches shouldn't make over $500k, and profits should be returned to the schools. Schools should be capped on what they can spend on facilities. The facilities at UT and Oregon (among others) are obscene and I'm not convinced it makes that much better of an athlete. NFL team facilities fall short in comparison because they don't have to recruit. Yet, the players are well conditioned.
The pageantry of college football is guys suiting up in dingy locker rooms under the stadium, not getting mani-pedis before the game in the training room. It's freaking ridiculous. Sadly, fans will continue to buy the tickets and apparel until they destroy this thing.
I don't like the thought of an college athlete drawing a salary either but they also should have more freedom or ability to invest in their long term physical health. I don't know what the right answer is, but it lies somewhere in the middle of 'no money' and 'salary.'
But don't you think higher pay attracts better coaches? It's a product driven by a free market and I have no problem with schools *ahem* boosters paying out the butt for the best coach out there. What would Nick Saban be doing if Alabama couldn't pay 8 million a year or whatever. He may be an assistant in the NFL or doing something else and he wouldn't be putting together ridiculous teams like we haven't seen in decades.
I wonder if elevating teachers' salaries would breed a better product or attract the best of the best.