And my only point(which how the hell its trolling is beyond me) was our competitors will point out to this kid that lane/ Hurd will be the tantrum. They will point out, not saying fairly, that we only use 2 this year.
It's something we have to overcome to get another RB.
And my only point(which how the hell its trolling is beyond me) was our competitors will point out to this kid that lane/ Hurd will be the tandem. They will point out, not saying fairly, that we only use 2 this year.
It's something we have to overcome to get another RB.
It's pointless to bring up that other schools are going to use it against us. Yes.
If you don't think having Hurd committed along with our current roster isnt being used against us then you don't understand recruiting.
Certainly not saying it means we cant win this or any other RB recruiting battle just that its an obstacle.
If you don't think any angle possible is being used against every recruit you don't understand recruiting. In other news, water is wet.
What's your reasoning this guy isn't talked about very strongly as being a member of the class??
IMO it's having Hurd committed and we didn't start pushing him until late(after Paulk got Hurt)
I think RB recruiting was on the back burner having 2 we were very comfortable with. After the injuries it looks like they started back recruiting in earnest.