C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 27,306
- Likes
- 48,572
The body armor bothers me more than the AR-15. A person equips themselves that way when they have the expectation that they are about to be fired upon. Why would a citizen have such an expectation, if they are obeying the law? Nobody goes grocery shopping in body armor.What would be the reasoning behind letting an 18 year old buy AR-15s? Ya think he's going rabbit hunting???
Who relies on Fox News for solutions?
It's easy to tell. Look for the least substantive, least comprehensive replies here; especially those that dwell in absolutes and/or use epithets, derogatory language, and denigration in their responses.
Also...
Consuming content from Fox News is associated with decreased knowledge of science and society
Which news source do you use? The view?
The body armor bothers me more than the AR-15. A person equips themselves that way when they have the expectation that they are about to be fired upon. Why would a citizen have such an expectation, if they are obeying the law? Nobody goes grocery shopping in body armor.
See, @PEPPERJAX ? Took only a few moments to prove the point.
Not really. What has occurred is people have improperly encroached on 2a. However that is also getting slowly corrected. 25 states have already legalized constitutional carry with more having legislation in works.No need to go that route. There's plenty of room intentionally built into 2a for rational and reasonable measures.
Hell, some have already been taken.
The body armor bothers me more than the AR-15. A person equips themselves that way when they have the expectation that they are about to be fired upon. Why would a citizen have such an expectation, if they are obeying the law? Nobody goes grocery shopping in body armor.
I don’t CC.
It’s just a core philosophy to my life and parenting. I don’t believe in making moves based on irrational fears.
The attitude we are speaking about here is why schools were shuttered and then reopened with mandatory masking.
I posed that question because a news outlet will not make the ultimate decision regarding gun violence or legislature. Their opinions even if you agree are meaningless.It's easy to tell. Look for the least substantive, least comprehensive replies here; especially those that dwell in absolutes and/or use epithets, derogatory language, and denigration in their responses.
Also...
Consuming content from Fox News is associated with decreased knowledge of science and society
I didn’t propose any of that. I merely was pointing to mental illness being the root issue, not the tool. I’m not interested in restricting “assault weapons” capable of causing “mass casualties” I’m not interested in parsing how many people dying is ok or not requiring action.Sounds like red flag laws and any ex girlfriend or boyfriend would have your rights stripped away over vendetta
You can anticipate most.
First question: Are you a democrat?
I didn’t propose any of that. I merely was pointing to mental illness being the root issue, not the tool. I’m not interested in restricting “assault weapons” capable of causing “mass casualties” I’m not interested in parsing how many people dying is ok or not requiring action.
http://flavorwire.com/469305/plagiarism-explained-in-forrest-gump-gifsI at least know what the constitution says and it’s intent. Of course you’re probably incapable of learning so you being “ignorant” wouldn’t be the correct choice of words.
That was stupid as hell you troll. Mental illness is the cause. This behavior is not the behavior of mentally healthy people.Thoughts and prayers. Mental illness.
Blah blah blah, don't deal with it.
That was stupid as hell you troll. Mental illness is the cause. This behavior is not the behavior of mentally healthy people.
As long as you refuse to recognize that and just continue to screech on the tool you can pound sand. In case you didn’t notice baryon wide the legislation leans more towards protecting gun ownership rights.