19 Year Old Dies After Denial From Transplant List For Trace THC

......and says "damn bro, don't bogart dat, pass that sheet over here, lemme hit it"
 
I'm not following the next to last comment. His positive test and the need for a transplant both happened at Thanksgiving.

I wonder if he had any respiratory issues before the Thanksgiving weekend.

Mickey Mantle had a history plus he was old. Good thing for him he had three strikes.

A quick Google search will find you reports to complete the story. He didn't end up in compete lung failure for a couple of weeks, and his parent claimed that before smoking at Thanksgiving, he was clean for a year.
 
A quick Google search will find you reports to complete the story. He didn't end up in compete lung failure for a couple of weeks, and his parent claimed that before smoking at Thanksgiving, he was clean for a year.

I'm sure you know this KD. But if you were to tell any Emergency Room doctor, AND I do mean ANY, that they should consider as reliable patient claims on what drugs and how much have been ingested (much less parent claims) you'll get a scournful "You don't know jacks$#1+! look from them, and deserve it.

But it's all they have in emergencys until the toxicology screen comes back. "People lie and people die".
 
I'm sure you know this KD. But if you were to tell any Emergency Room doctor, AND I do mean ANY, that they should consider as reliable patient claims on what drugs and how much have been ingested (much less parent claims) you'll get a scournful "You don't know jacks$#1+! look from them, and deserve it.

But it's all they have in emergencys until the toxicology screen comes back. "People lie and people die".

I discuss sex, drugs, alcohol, and tobacco every day with teenagers... I'm pretty keen to "underreporting." :thumbsup:
 
I discuss sex, drugs, alcohol, and tobacco every day with teenagers... I'm pretty keen to "underreporting." :thumbsup:

Same thing happens in pre op history. For some reason they won't tell me they smoke weed but will tell the nurse or the tech. I always tell them it's safer that I know than anyone else since I'm the one putting you to sleep. Versed is usually when the truth comes out
 
So pain meds are banned for those on the lists as well? Because medically they can be more damaging and are probably more addictive than marijuana.

narcotic analgesics (when they arent full synthetics) are less toxic than smoking weed.
 
Same thing happens in pre op history. For some reason they won't tell me they smoke weed but will tell the nurse or the tech. I always tell them it's safer that I know than anyone else since I'm the one putting you to sleep. Versed is usually when the truth comes out

Lol:
"Once in a while" = Most every day
"Twice" = Seven times
"A few" = a pack/six pack/10-12 times
"Last month" = yesterday
"Not in a long time" = last week
"Socially" = heavily
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Lol:
"Once in a while" = Most every day
"Twice" = Seven times
"A few" = a pack/six pack/10-12 times
"Last month" = yesterday
"Not in a long time" = last week
"Socially" = heavily

Pretty much spot on. When you get an honest answer it almost makes you shocked
 
A quick Google search will find you reports to complete the story. He didn't end up in compete lung failure for a couple of weeks, and his parent claimed that before smoking at Thanksgiving, he was clean for a year.

I'm still not getting your point with the next to last sentence. His positive test was shortly after his parent says he smoked for the first time in a year:
"First, one night of MJ use is not going to trigger a positive 4 months later."
 
Lol:
"Once in a while" = Most every day
"Twice" = Seven times
"A few" = a pack/six pack/10-12 times
"Last month" = yesterday
"Not in a long time" = last week
"Socially" = heavily

So somebody that consumes anything in moderation will have to lie that they take nothing in order to get a more accurate perception? All patients are assumed to be lying because some do? I guess I'm screwed since I don't smoke or drink... I can't say I consume negative quantities in order to compensate for the assumed to be lying adjustment.
 
So riddle me this. Tobacco use has been studied to a fare thee well and the results are pretty damning. Warning labels are on all products. Big Brother has taxed it almost into the ground in a effort to suppress use.

Why don't they make tobacco illegal?
 
So somebody that consumes anything in moderation will have to lie that they take nothing in order to get a more accurate perception? All patients are assumed to be lying because some do? I guess I'm screwed since I don't smoke or drink... I can't say I consume negative quantities in order to compensate for the assumed to be lying adjustment.

pretry much. Why people lie to doctors about recreational drug use and alcohol is beyond me. If someone tells me they are clean I believe them. If they tell me the drink a few beers a day I ask if that's 2 or 6. Most say two and some days more so I push daily use to 6 max. As for drugs, either you do or don't and when was last dose/for how long. Also, are you on Suboxone or other narcotic antagonist. But you don't have to say negative if you don't do any. It's really your health that is at risk when you lie to a medical provider.
 
Same thing happens in pre op history. For some reason they won't tell me they smoke weed but will tell the nurse or the tech. I always tell them it's safer that I know than anyone else since I'm the one putting you to sleep. Versed is usually when the truth comes out

Show me legitimate studies on how marijuana is contraindicated in patients undergoing surgery.

Lol:
"Once in a while" = Most every day
"Twice" = Seven times
"A few" = a pack/six pack/10-12 times
"Last month" = yesterday
"Not in a long time" = last week
"Socially" = heavily

It's sad doctors assume EVERY patient is lying. I hate it for the patients who actually give an honest answer and you automatically multiply that by 3 in some judgmental fashion.
 
Last edited:
It's sad doctors assume EVERY patient is lying. I hate it for the patients who actually give an honest answer and you automatically multiply that by 3 in some judgmental fashion.

Lighten up, Francis. You might be surprised at the number of immaculate conceptions I've seen, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Show me legitimate studies on how marijuana is contraindicated in patients undergoing surgery.



It's sad doctors assume EVERY patient is lying. I hate it for the patients who actually give an honest answer and you automatically multiply that by 3 in some judgmental fashion.

I sure will but you need subscriptions to see them
 

This paper from almost 3 decades ago concludes that due to several interactions of weed with the body and anesthetic drugs used in surgery, that surgery should be delayed for THC ingestion if possible, or only local anesthesia used if not possible. Those results will probably not have changed since the paper was produced.

However, as it was written in the late 70s, are there any available that are more recent, like from this century?
 
Last edited:
This paper from almost 3 decades ago concludes that due to several interactions of weed with the body and anesthetic drugs used in surgery, that surgery should be delayed for THC ingestion if possible, or only local anesthesia used if not possible. Those results will probably not have changed since the paper was produced.

However, as it was written in the late 70s, are there any available that are more recent, like from this century?

The science of THC hasn't changed but that was one of the only "free" ones I have. You could take my word for it as an anesthetist and 20 years of education and experience that THC/MJ have adverse effects to anesthesia and surgical outcomes. Those being pneumonia, uvular swelling, atelectasis
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The science of THC hasn't changed but that was one of the only "free" ones I have. You could take my word for it as an anesthetist and 20 years of education and experience that THC/MJ have adverse effects to anesthesia and surgical outcomes. Those being pneumonia, uvular swelling, atelectasis

Thanks. So, what I'm hearing is pneumonia after and/or lung collapse during surgery are real possibilities for those who have used weed. How long before surgery should they stop to eliminate these weed induced possibilities?
 
Thanks. So, what I'm hearing is pneumonia after and/or lung collapse during surgery are real possibilities for those who have used weed. How long before surgery should they stop to eliminate these weed induced possibilities?

As well as cardiac issues and possible ischemia and infarction. Mainly the highest risk is those that smoked or dosed and came in for emergency so as long as you aren't high the THC shouldn't cause too much harm. If you are a chronic user and smoke it I would suggest stopping for at least six days to help with lung issues. As for edibles and oils, not much research on those but being clean is the safest way to survive surgery and anesthesia without complications. And always tell your provider what you take. We aren't going to turn you over to the cops. We are trying to make sure you are safe and comfortable as possible
 
The science of THC hasn't changed but that was one of the only "free" ones I have. You could take my word for it as an anesthetist and 20 years of education and experience that THC/MJ have adverse effects to anesthesia and surgical outcomes. Those being pneumonia, uvular swelling, atelectasis

Wouldn't the possibility of adverse effects be highly, positively correlated to how recent the use? I'd assume that there are different results for use a day before a surgery versus a week. Also, is this study only looking at subjects that smoked the marijuana and not those that, for example, ate brownies? Are the results similar for users of alcohol?

Edit: some questions answered in post just above.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top