19 Year Old Dies After Denial From Transplant List For Trace THC

No, that's not how this works. Overdose is taking enough to harm you. That's why heroin users can overdose despite there being no prescribed daily amount.

Bottom line of this image is what I'm talking about. The article link is here: https://www.google.com/amp/articles.../03/26/amp/acetaminophen-overdose.aspx#amph=1
funny, and all this is saying is tynenol is deadly when it is overdosed just as in the definition I gave you above so you once again proved my point.
 
And in those cases how many where dehydrated or had co morbidity? Yes, Tylenol can lead to liver failure but it's most likely in cases of over dose or misuse. It's not killing people who use it for headaches once a week.

At not point did I claim occasional small doses were harmful. Idk why you've picked this to argue about.
 
If he signed and was tested the same day, how can you accuse him of not following the rules?

You sign the contract, you test negative, you are told not to smoke or use pot, you smoke pot after that on thanksgiving and test positive after you have signed a contract saying you wouldn't do that, you
Are delisted.
 
funny, and all this is saying is tynenol is deadly when it is overdosed just as in the definition I gave you above so you once again proved my point.

Taking the recommended dose for enough consecutive days will also kill you. As it stated. Idk why that's so hard for you to comprehend.

This is what I've been saying from the beginning. You questioned it. I backed it up.

What's your deal?

Tylenol kills 400-500 people a year. It's something I warn my football players about. They think it's harmless and many will try to use such things daily, which leads to liver failure.
 
Because you brought up Tylenol being this"huge" killer and it's not

458 people a year and 100k overdoses compared to marijuana, is a huge killer. That was the entire point of this. Another poster made claims of marijuana being harmful. I stated it was less harmful than some OTC pain killers. Apparently something there triggered you.
 
458 people a year and 100k overdoses compared to marijuana, is a huge killer. That was the entire point of this. Another poster made claims of marijuana being harmful. I stated it was less harmful than some OTC pain killers. Apparently something there triggered you.

but it's not killing 100k, how many deaths are thee for marijuana overdose? 500 isn't a huge killer, that's less than bee stings
 
but it's not killing 100k, how many deaths are thee for marijuana overdose?

0. The 50% lethal dose is almost impossible to achieve outside of edibles.

And once again, I never claimed it killed 100k people.
 
What about death? Unlike marijuana otc painkillers kill huge amounts of people annually.

Last I checked death is far worse

In none of the studies you mentioned have they proven marijuana caused mental illness. It's equally likely that people with mental illnesses are attracted to marijuana.

Untrue
 
Why should pot be illegal while cigarettes, alcohol, diet Coke, and bacon aren't? Those things have been studied as well, probably more than pot, and haven't the results shown them to all be harmful?

Once again, where am I arguing legality? I simply presented the medical position (which basically every neurologist, psychiatrist, etc) agree on, with evidence-based literature, that cannibus is not entirely "harmless."
 
Tylenol kills 400-500 people a year. It's something I warn my football players about. They think it's harmless and many will try to use such things daily, which leads to liver failure.

That is not from people abusing Tylenol for a high. That is from being too stupid to read the bottle or talk to your doctor.
 
Totally anecdotal but I have noticed that some people who smoke a lot and don't do anything else recreationally are prone to short bursts of extreme rage over things that I imagine most people would not freak out over.

too clarify, I'll add that I am pushing 50 and am talking about people my age who have been smoking a lot for a good three decades.
 
Once again, where am I arguing legality? I simply presented the medical position (which basically every neurologist, psychiatrist, etc) agree on, with evidence-based literature, that cannibus is not entirely "harmless."

Most of the literature I saw said the opposite because you just copied an pasted an entire bibliography and assumed it meet your agenda.
 
That is not from people abusing Tylenol for a high. That is from being too stupid to read the bottle or talk to your doctor.

What difference does that make? That only makes Tylenol worse. It kills people who are simply attempting to eliminate their pain. Marijuana kills no one, even those trying to get high
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There's probably a large majority for whom infrequent recreational use is pretty much harmless. There are probably a few out there who will turn completely psychotic if they get high. Same thing happens with alcohol and other drugs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There's probably a large majority for whom infrequent recreational use is pretty much harmless. There are probably a few out there who will turn completely psychotic if they get high. Same thing happens with alcohol and other drugs.

I'm not convinced of that. I think it's more likely that people with existing mental issues are more likely to seek drugs such as marijuana.
 
There's probably a large majority for whom infrequent recreational use is pretty much harmless. There are probably a few out there who will turn completely psychotic if they get high. Same thing happens with alcohol and other drugs.

Marijuana does not cause rage, not even close. Actually the opposite. Now, marijuana is not harmless, I agree with that. But it does not cause extreme rage or turn someone physchotic.
 

VN Store



Back
Top