Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 47,207
- Likes
- 45,245
I consider it harmless.
What difference does that make? That only makes Tylenol worse. It kills people who are simply attempting to eliminate their pain. Marijuana kills no one, even those trying to get high
So you don't think long use marijuana smoking can cause health issues in your lungs? Anything you inhale into your lungs is not harmless.
I'm not against it, quite the opposite as I am a daily user. But I also know that it can be cause health problems later in life, especially if I keep smoking.
Clogging up those blood vessels will cause the heart to work harder and fail sooner. Shouldn't priority be given to those with the cleanest arteries?
Does THC cause lung failure?
Most of the literature I saw said the opposite because you just copied an pasted an entire bibliography and assumed it meet your agenda.
Actually, if you will back off and read my post rather than take a moronically-defensive stance against science, you will see that I posted the summary of the known effects of cannabis use. My "agenda" is to educate, as many people are ignorant to the truth.
Rather than cherry pick articles damning THC, the bib contains research that collectively gives us understanding. ONCE AGAIN: there are no conclusive long-term health conditions known to be caused by MJ use, aside from the few I noted.
On the schizophrenia/mental illness front: the evidence is convincing and not surprising. Habitual intoxication using any neuroactive chemical would be expected to cause dependency and risk alteration of the psyche.
If you don't think that acute intoxication causes memory impairment, slowed motor response, and reduced cognitive functioning, then you have either a) never been around anyone high, or b) become afflicted by mental illness (perhaps by chronic cannabis use).
The contract banned "illicit drugs", therefore the legality of marijuana is relevant. He was denied a transplant because of the legality of marijuana
There was no frickin' "contract" because he needed a transplant.
Again the timeline...
1. Healthy boy is home for Thanksgiving.
2. Healthy boy meets up with an old friend(s?) and smoke some dope.
3.Boy gets serious pneumonia that destroys a significant portion of his lung function.
It is not known if what caused the pneumonia was marijuana related or not.
a) He could have simply been unlucky enough to have contracted an exceptionally virulent strain of pneumonia.
b) He may have contracted pneumonia from mold on the marijuana.
c) He may have contracted chemical induced pneumonia from agricultural chemicals on the pot.
We simply are not told one way or another.
However, he did not have a "contract" to get a transplant.
He was told he could not be placed on the list based on the transplant organization criteria to which the hospital subscribes.
I have posted above a link to transplant candidate criteria.
I also posted a link to an article discussing the possible positive affects of cannibis during the transplant acceptance and process California is discussing.
Actually, if you will back off and read my post rather than take a moronically-defensive stance against science, you will see that I posted the summary of the known effects of cannabis use. My "agenda" is to educate, as many people are ignorant to the truth.
Rather than cherry pick articles damning THC, the bib contains research that collectively gives us understanding. ONCE AGAIN: there are no conclusive long-term health conditions known to be caused by MJ use, aside from the few I noted.
On the schizophrenia/mental illness front: the evidence is convincing and not surprising. Habitual intoxication using any neuroactive chemical would be expected to cause dependency and risk alteration of the psyche.
If you don't think that acute intoxication causes memory impairment, slowed motor response, and reduced cognitive functioning, then you have either a) never been around anyone high, or b) become afflicted by mental illness (perhaps by chronic cannabis use).
I think it makes Tylenol better. It's eliminating people from the gene pool who either can't read or can't follow simple instructions. Either way they were most likely net drains on the system.