bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,528
- Likes
- 48,028
Memphis has been a better program than Tennessee, and it's impossible to argue otherwise, but that has nothing to do with the Nichols situation or Memphis' recruiting class.
If you're going to beat Memphis on their home turf for a player, you need an edge. Pearl's success and style of play, over time, could have maybe been that edge. Martin's style of play isn't going to win over any kids and the success remains to be seen. He doesn't have an argument to tell a kid that Tennessee will be the best place for them, at least not yet.
How can you say it's clear cut Memphis has the historically better program?
As of now, yes I agree...but in terms of their entire body of work if you compare the numbers it's nowhere as lopsided as you're trying to make it sound.
Tennessee vs. Memphis Tale of the Tape
All time wins:
Tennessee: 1508
Memphis: 1406
Head 2 Head:
Tennessee: 14
Memphis 10
Win pct.
Tennessee: 61%
Memphis: 63%
NCAA TOURNAMENT APPEARANCES:
Tennessee: 19
Memphis: 18
Final Four Appearances:
Tennessee: 0
Memphis: 1
Elite 8:
Tennessee: 1
Memphis: 4
Sweet 16:
Tennessee: 6
Memphis: 5
Numbers don't lie, you guys try to act like you're some power house basketball school but when you break it down you're on the same level we are...sorry.
Last edited: