2020 Presidential Race

[RavinDave]

There are a ridiculous number of items in this election that don’t fit historical patterns. The COVID situation could be the enabler to help any mischief or just the reason why everything was so different. But that alone isn’t PROOF. Where I’m at is a bunch of stuff looks questionable as hell, but if you can’t prove anything then there is no case. And that’s the way it has to be, for what’s at stake there must be irrefutable PROOF

Well, and I don't disagree. A professional thief is well-versed in covering his tracks.

 

[AM64]

Ah but yes Biden and Schumer are moderates

Not sure about moderate, but they are both certainly fools.

 

[NorthDallas40]

The key is that you have to actually investigate to see if there is proof. Blowing off every challenge isn't listening to and certainly not investigating what may or may not be fraud.

I don’t disagree. Right now there are lots of accusations that are just being ignored.

 

[Bassmaster_Vol]

Ah but yes Biden and Schumer are moderates

This is pure evil. Just like hormone therapy for children that the dems support. How could anyone support these things? Despicable.

 

[GSD82]

Not sure about moderate, but they are both certainly fools.

They are radical leftists they just appear to be moderate because they rest of their party are communists

 

[Stew Cook]

What dis?

Justice Department investigating potential presidential pardon bribery scheme, court records reveal - CNNPolitics

 

[GSD82]

This is pure evil. Just like hormone therapy for children that the dems support. How could anyone support these things? Despicable.

That’s your modern day democrat party

 

[RavinDave]

Not sure about moderate, but they are both certainly fools.

The difference is, Biden is a hapless fool while Schumer is potentially a dangerous fool.

 

[AM64]

The CEO of the company said that source code reviews are performed as part of the certification process.

Right. And Boeing's CEO made virtually the same comment, and we saw where that went.

 

[RockyTop85]

Yep I saw that. That’s called a “design review” Now go back to the SoS statement when they conducted an “audit” and extrapolate that to a source code review. Protip: you can’t. So about that chest thumping dunk you tried to take

View attachment 327109

Ah, so despite the CEO of the company (who apparently doesn’t use the precise terminology) saying that states perform source code reviews, you’re sticking with “the Secretary of State who has no known computer programming experience used ‘audit’ as a term of art rather than the same way that every other person uses it.”

Next time the IRS asks to “audit” my taxes, I’ll send them a TurboTax CD, I bet that’ll go over great.

Apparently, appearing dumber than rocks is preferable to being wrong, for some people.

 

[AM64]

View attachment 327108

You found Dink?

 

[OldVolMan]

Damn you would think Barr could at least change his style of eyeglasses every 20/30 years.

 

[RockyTop85]

Right. And Boeing's CEO made virtually the same comment, and we saw where that went.

Why don’t you and @NorthDallas40 get on the same page. Is he lying or is there some obscure interpretation that makes his words mean something completely different than their plain meaning? I’ll wait while you two hash it out.

 

[AM64]

*effected

So much for journalistic competence. AP's been around long enough to avoid rookie mistakes.

 

[RockyTop85]

@RockyTop85

Who is the person who tweeted that? It sort of suggests that actual malice is not an element of a defamation claim for a corporation. I never got around to looking that up.

Edit: nm. I read his Twitter profile.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Right. And Boeing's CEO made virtually the same comment, and we saw where that went.

You understand how software works. Our esteemed pettifogger is just blowing wind.

When the source code is reviewed at the DESIGN REVIEW and checked into the configuration management system then you build the executable. That executable has a CRC as well as embedded ID strings normally now. During an AUDIT you can extract (<- the exact word used in the SoS statement) the executable and compare the CRC and ID string to the configuration management data. That is still not a VALIDATION TEST or source code review.

This is just how you manage software regardless of what industry it’s being applied in.

Also, it assumes all parties are acting in a good faith manner between the source code review and compiled code generation. ( Tim foil hat parting shot )

 

[NorthDallas40]

Ah, so despite the CEO of the company (who apparently doesn’t use the precise terminology) saying that states perform source code reviews, you’re sticking with “the Secretary of State who has no known computer programming experience used ‘audit’ as a term of art rather than the same way that every other person uses it.”

Next time the IRS asks to “audit” my taxes, I’ll send them a TurboTax CD, I bet that’ll go over great.

Apparently, appearing dumber than rocks is preferable to being wrong, for some people.

He didn’t say the state conducted source code reviews. They don’t have that expertise. Contracted labs do.

Stick to... whatever it is you do.

Why do you open the TurboTax CD and extract the source code from the executable and review it

 

[RockyTop85]

He didn’t say the state conducted source code reviews. They don’t have that expertise. Contracted labs do.

Stick to... whatever it is you do.

He said exactly that. Almost verbatim. Read it again.

 

[volfanhill]

Please provide examples of any AG not backing the President he serves.

Apparently this one according to many on here.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Why don’t you and @NorthDallas40 get on the same page. Is he lying or is there some obscure interpretation that makes his words mean something completely different than their plain meaning? I’ll wait while you two hash it out.

You’re apparently not smart enough to understand the plain words being used.

 

[RockyTop85]

You’re apparently not smart enough to understand the plain words being used.

Oh yeah, maybe “states replicate this process for their own certification” has some super secret “engineer” meaning.

 

[NorthDallas40]

He said exactly that. Almost verbatim. Read it again.

He said they contracted third party labs via a bipartisan panel. But yeah sure that’s verbatim

 

[NorthDallas40]

Oh yeah, maybe “states replicate this process for their own certification” has some super secret “engineer” meaning.

It’s clearly above your intelligence

 

[PointGuard]

Did anyone ever explain the need for ballot drop boxes - why the ballots couldn't simply go in the mail since that's presumably how they got to the voter in the first place.

You mean those “ unsanctioned illegal” ballot boxes like the ones Republicans dropped in CA?

 

[volfanhill]

I don’t disagree. Right now there are lots of accusations that are just being ignored.

Trumps legal team should bring them before judges. Of course some of this we can research on our own. Like how Dominion voting machines were not related in any way to Venezuela and Hugo Chavis. Meaning anyone who is being sourced as "news" who propagated that fairy tail can be readily ignored. Or the "sworn affidavit" swearing that irregularities happened in a county in Minnesota (might have been Michigan can't remember for sure) but oops that county doesn't exist in that state. You would think a good legal team would research some of this crap before they file it in a lawsuit. Unless of course they are just seeing how much poop can they throw against the wall.