BenGrimm
Formally known as burntorangeVOLffle
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 16,021
- Likes
- 10,036
I know it's over, I am aware the cheating was so widespread there is no way to change it. I accepted that the day after the election. The cheaters have spoken. Best case scenario is Rs change laws or make laws fixing it going forward but I don't have much faith in that either.
Exactly. so if true either way it’s a huge F up.Sure it does, or would especially if true. Its not surprising that the driver's account is being spun to fit a narrative, but anyone making the leap to the ballots being fake and later inserted into the count is making quite the slanted leap.
Of course my slanted leap just won't do.
Stick to whatever it is you do and don’t offer professional opinions on software design or validation methods would be both mine and @AM64 ’s recommendation
OMFG you are dense. The statement is clear. The CEO laid out the process for third party validation for FEDERAL elections and said states replicate that process. Only an idiot would infer states hire their own software team. Here it is read it again if your reading comprehension is up to the task pettifogger. It’s clear the CEO is referring to the federal validation system which the states REPLICATE. Not replication of software design capability. Nowhere does it state the Feds or states validate their own source code only and idiot would infer that also. LMFAO. I hope you give discounts when you handle technology related cases. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Good effort, but when the CEO of the company who sold the software says that a federally selected third party and states both did the exact thing you claimed needed to be done, hadn’t been done, and that they didn’t have the capacity to do, it’s time to pack it in.
You were wrong. You should have known you were wrong. I did. It was obvious. Now it’s confirmed. If you want to compound the indignity by pretending to be illiterate, that’s up to you, but you’ll still be wrong.
Better luck next time.
OMFG you are dense. The statement is clear. The CEO laid out the process for third party validation for FEDERAL elections and Saud states replicate that process. Only an idiot would infer states hire their own software team. Here it is read it again if your reading comprehension is up to the task pettifogger. It’s clear the CEO is referring to the federal validation system which the states REPLICATE. Not replication of software design capability. LMFAO. I hope you give discounts when you handle technology related cases. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
View attachment 327305
Guys, I know this is the election thread so this is my last betting post...thanks
MP, even better than that if I read it correctly if my original deposit is made with cryptocurrency then I get a 100% match up to $1,000.
Do we have a forum or thread on VN? I went to Gaming and did not see anything pertaining to betting, maybe I missed it.
What have I missed? I have a couple on ignore. If I am the one being called racist, I gladly accept the title. If you haven't been called a racist from the weak, pansy assed, white guilt sufferers(and KTK) on this forum, you are doing something wrong.Sorry, I should have used the blue. 72 is good people
For the humor value and the damage it would do to the republican party, I say do it.
For the damage it would do the country, I say please no.
The last Dem POTUS assassinated US citizen with little pushback from his supporters. That's one of the most unpatriotic things to ever happen.The possibility of Trump running in 2024 is going to screw the GOP until and all their Presidential hopefuls until he says he isn't running. And he isn't going to declare that anytime soon. It couldn't happen to a better bunch of unpatriotic people