2024 Presidential Race

[volfanhill]

A good rule of thumb for me is that the side who promotes hatred and intolerance are seldom the good guys.

one of the biggest jokes in politics is the belief that the left is “tolerant.”

 

[luthervol]

Isn’t censorship by its very nature intolerant?

There is always that weird dichotomy of not completely tolerating intolerance.

 

[Vol8188]

There is always that weird dichotomy of not completely tolerating intolerance.

Do you support laws against hate speech?

 

[rekinhavoc]

Do you support laws against hate speech?

 

[C-south]

A good rule of thumb for me is that the side who promotes hatred and intolerance are seldom the good guys.

That would be the same loonies you support.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Those who voted against Trump in 2020 got played. Now they’ve lived with their choice and will want to go back to mean tweet and comfortable lifestyle.

I'll believe it if I see it

 

[OrangeTsar]

A good rule of thumb for me is that the side who promotes hatred and intolerance are seldom the good guys.

Huh?
Do you even LISTEN to your own party?

 

[The Sheriff]

Apparently now there only losing in the polls because “most polls are done by landline”. The leftists are floundering.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

The left forgets that there is always video.

 

[luthervol]

Do you support laws against hate speech?

Not yet. I hope we can avoid reaching the point where they become necessary.

 

[Vol8188]

Not yet. I hope we can avoid reaching the point where they become necessary.

Lol

 

[volfanhill]

Not yet. I hope we can avoid reaching the point where they become necessary.

Such a point where they become “necessary” does not exist

 

[C-south]

Not yet. I hope we can avoid reaching the point where they become necessary.

Why would they be necessary? At what point would words become a criminal offense? Yes we already know bomb threats and such are already against the law. Would calling Caitlin Jenner a dude be something you would want to prosecute?

 

[luthervol]

Huh?
Do you even LISTEN to your own party?

Huh?
Bannon/Stone/Manafort - the trumpian holy trinity. Ring a bell?????

 

[luthervol]

Why would they be necessary? At what point would words become a criminal offense? Yes we already know bomb threats and such are already against the law. Would calling Caitlin Jenner a dude be something you would want to prosecute?

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

 

[C-south]

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

I’ll dumb it down for you. At what point does voicing an opinion or belief break the law? We all know making threats can be against the law unless you’re promoting blm riots and violence.

 

[luthervol]

Such a point where they become “necessary” does not exist

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

 

[luthervol]

I’ll dumb it down for you. At what point does voicing an opinion or belief break the law? We all know making threats can be against the law unless you’re promoting blm riots and violence.

How about dumbing it down by answering the questions.

 

[Vol8188]

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

What about Kamala and her project 2025 lies? Going as far as to hire planes to flow over stadiums with claims connecting trump and project 2025.

That misinformation is fine, right?

 

[luthervol]

What about Kamala and her project 2025 lies? Going as far as to hire planes to flow over stadiums with claims connecting trump and project 2025.

That misinformation is fine, right?

Trump is 100% in on project 2025. He is straight up lying when he claims otherwise.

 

[hog88]

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

When it injures another person.

 

[volfanhill]

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

If the “hate speech” leads to threats against a specific persons safety its already against the law. You can not threaten to harm others. Outside of that, say what you gotta say. And if what I say causes someone to be motivated to hurt someone else not my problem

 

[luthervol]

When it injures another person.

So if speech is deemed to injure another person, it should be illegal?

 

[CobbVol]

Trump is 100% in on project 2025. He is straight up lying when he claims otherwise.

Not true. You have been fooled with coachspeak.

 

[CobbVol]

Why are bomb threats against the law? And is that an appropriate restriction on free speech?

You are threatening others with a bomb.