ajvol01
GBO!
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 25,426
- Likes
- 30,005
Bringing it back around to where it started:
Can we just get some people to admit that higher education is more complex and diverse a place than they originally gave it credit for, and that what is reported on are generally the more interesting groups on both sides of the political spectrum? That an individual's experience is largely what they make of things, for better or for worse? And that if you go into a situation looking for the good you're likely to find the good and if you go in looking for the bad you're likely to find the bad?
That totally runs counter to what this guy in the article experienced, however. He came in with a preconceived notion of what "snowflakes" were and has come away with a different opinion.Bringing it back around to where it started:
Can we just get some people to admit that higher education is more complex and diverse a place than they originally gave it credit for, and that what is reported on are generally the more interesting groups on both sides of the political spectrum? That an individual's experience is largely what they make of things, for better or for worse? And that if you go into a situation looking for the good you're likely to find the good and if you go in looking for the bad you're likely to find the bad?
There will always be those who mock education, especially higher education. It's as inevitable as the sunrise.
The devolving of “higher” education has made a mockery of itself. There’s less than a handful of occupations that should require more than 4 years of school and most that time beyond that should be used for internships. Then there’s some that shouldn’t require any but I’m not even sure what occupation a degree in gender studies would be good for to begin with. At some point it becomes a hobby instead of an accomplishment. I guess putting in the time can be used to get a pay raise/advancement in some instances as well although it really isn’t needed or improve job capability. Of course those that can DO and those that can’t “TEACH”.
I would submit the professor has rights to jack ****. They don’t own a thing in that classroom besides the clothes on their back and the supplies they brought with them. And if higher education is about pushing your boundaries and understanding others, suppressing free speech doesn’t seem to be conducive to that end. A professor has no more right to make a student remove a MAGA hat than he does to make them take off a BLM or Che Guevara shirt.I haven't read anyone's post here condoning physical violence. The professor has a right to ask his students not to wear such hats.
It seems like the perfect opportunity to actually prepare them for the real world as supposed to trying to protect them from things they find offensive
I said disruptive not offensive. Many would do it to get a reaction ande cause issues (likely for social media cred). If I'm doing stuff like that at my work I'd get removed too. That's real worldIt seems like the perfect opportunity to actually prepare them for the real world as supposed to trying to protect them from things they find offensive
It’s only disruptive bc someone finds the hat offensive. If the kid in the MAGA is yelling MAGA and interrupting the lecture then they are the disruptive one. The act of wearing that hat is not disruptive.I said disruptive not offensive. Many would do it to get a reaction ande cause issues (likely for social media cred). If I'm doing stuff like that at my work I'd get removed too. That's real world
Not at all. I disrupted plenty of classes growing up without ever being offensive. Simply wearing it means nothing but I highly doubt many stop at thatIt’s only disruptive bc someone finds the hat offensive. If the kid in the MAGA is yelling MAGA and interrupting the lecture then they are the disruptive one. The act of wearing that hat is not disruptive.
Not at all. I disrupted plenty of classes growing up without ever being offensive. Simply wearing it means nothing but I highly doubt many stop at that
I can't presume for liberals since I'm not one. It's obvious you didn't read my post at all before replying since I explained what simply wearing the hat meant imo.So you presume as much as the other liberals. I’m sure the disruption in your opinion would be the person simply wearing a hat and not the ones violently triggered by it because it hurts their feelings.
I can't presume for liberals since I'm not one. It's obvious you didn't read my post at all before replying since I explained what simply wearing the hat meant imo.