Republicans need to pull back on social issues and concentrate on fiscal issues, like the deficit. One social issue they can still pound home is trans treatments on kids. Let's protect our kids
You men worry about your lives and let women take care of themselves and make their own health and reproduction decisions.
They've made it quite clear that they won't have a bunch of middle-aged male crazies telling them how to live their lives.
Will do, don't worry. Now promise the rest of us that you and your boyfriend/girlfriend won't procreate or adopt.You men worry about your lives and let women take care of themselves and make their own health and reproduction decisions.
They've made it quite clear that they won't have a bunch of middle-aged male crazies telling them how to live their lives.
Unless and until it's accepted that a fetus is a "person" to the point it can effectively be incorporated under Federal jurisprudence the across state lines argument doesn't work. In fact as we sit here now there are a BUNCH of laws that vary greatly from state to state.I get that. We already did in the 14th.
The job of the Feds is to provide the bedrock, basic, absolute lowest form of safety. Life and death is pretty much bedrock, right?
I said at the very start of this: like slavery, this is going to be a major problem in America.
You can't have "equal protection under the law" if something or someone IS HUMAN and IS ALIVE in one state and is a group of cells in the other. If a group of cells in America can be killed because "they aren't old enough to have protection as a human in this state yet, but they are one state over"......... the Feds need to decide what a human is in America because that's bedrock to defending the rights of humans.
We did this in the 14th. It's going to be trouble until we do it again.
It's COMPLETELY disingenuous to say "you don't want government to meddle in people's lives" then turn around and say "it's up to the states" as if that's not government.Unless and until it's accepted that a fetus is a "person" to the point it can effectively be incorporated under Federal jurisprudence the across state lines argument doesn't work. In fact as we sit here now there are a BUNCH of laws that vary greatly from state to state.
The upshot is your insistence that "life and death" is "bedrock" doesn't get where you want to go if the definition of "life" isn't agreed upon...and at this point it very much isn't. That isn't for you (or me or anyone for that matter) to contest...it's a fact there is fierce division on the matter and it's a fact it's not currently under Federal jurisdiction to make the distinction. Thus it's a matter left to the states.
You need a civics classIt's COMPLETELY disingenuous to say "you don't want government to meddle in people's lives" then turn around and say "it's up to the states" as if that's not government.
You need to grow a pair. If you REALLY don't want government to have a say, the state should stay out of it also because it's really a medical decision, right?
If the fetus has rights at the state level, it has rights at the federal level.
Grow a pair and admit that.
You need to grow a pair too.You need a civics class
You have had this explained to you. I am not capable of making you comprehend something that has been already explained. Quite well, I might add, by others.You need to grow a pair too.
If it's not okay to kill someone at the state level, it's not okay to kill them at the federal level.
If it is, educate me as to why. If a a fetus HAS rights in America, it has rights like even a dog which you can't just legally kill for no good reason.
You guys need to stand up or sit down.
So "leaving it to the states" isn't having government overreach and "decide what life is and isn't" but having the Feds involved is "government overreach" and they "can't decide what life is and isn't?"You have had this explained to you. I am not capable of making you comprehend something that has been already explained. Quite well, I might add, by others.
You need to grow a pair too.
If it's not okay to kill someone at the state level, it's not okay to kill them at the federal level.
If it is, educate me as to why. If a a fetus HAS rights in America, it has rights like even a dog which you can't just legally kill for no good reason.
You guys need to stand up or sit down.
This is taking the central question of the debate out of the equation.It boils down to: if you don’t want to have an abortion, don’t have an abortion… but don’t try to legislate your beliefs onto everyone else who clearly don’t see it the same way. This is obviously how the majority of Americans feel.
I want you to grow a pair and stand up for the fetus which can't take care of its rights in America.Let me get this straight, you want us to grow a pair and beg the federal government to take more power?
I want you to grow a pair and stand up for the fetus which can't take care of its rights in America.
NOWHERE in America should an innocent live human be deprived of the same right to life and same protections under the law as any other human.
The Feds couldn't just "punt" slavery without causing a national disaster. Trying to "punt" abortion and say "you can kill a fetus in CA because that's what they want" but "you can't in TN because that's what they want" is every bit of replaying the mid-1800s.
I'm not sure what makes it seem okay to you that a fetus should have the right not to be killed in one state but lose that right at the state line. And you say my America is terrifying?
You need to grow a pair too.
If it's not okay to kill someone at the state level, it's not okay to kill them at the federal level.
If it is, educate me as to why. If a a fetus HAS rights in America, it has rights like even a dog which you can't just legally kill for no good reason.
You guys need to stand up or sit down.
Y'know, I thought I'd been doing a decent job of being both courteous and clear with our discussion to that point. I've made no personal statements on the matter whatsoever so you can shove your "disingenuous" accusation. What I've been trying to explain is what you assert doesn't square with how the law works. I would be making very similar observations to anyone that was asking about demanding abortion be Federally protected. Your emotional investment (as understandable as it might be given the subject matter) has exceeded your ability (or willingness) to gasp how the system in place actually operates. Have problems with that system? Fair enough...but don't get huffy when people take the time to try and lay it for you.It's COMPLETELY disingenuous to say "you don't want government to meddle in people's lives" then turn around and say "it's up to the states" as if that's not government.
You need to grow a pair. If you REALLY don't want government to have a say, the state should stay out of it also because it's really a medical decision, right?
If the fetus has rights at the state level, it has rights at the federal level.
Grow a pair and admit that.
I quoted the 14th which DID fix the problem.Then grow a pair and work on getting a constitutional amendment passed and ratified.