Brave Volunteer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 18,070
- Likes
- 21,489
I'm really not trolling here. I see blood, breath, or urine testing as the only way to prove either guilt or innocence for a DUI.
He seems to believe the only time you should be charged with a DUI is after you wreck. That's outrageous.
that is fine but it should be decided in court. there are reasons to refuse, and the person should have to explain them. if the jury or judge does not buy it then they get a DUI. im against this unjust implied consent law
That's fine. I would agree then that the amount of marijuana required, should be enough to prove that you were under the influence at that time. As opposed to the current limit of 0. But that doesn't mean we should get rid of blood testing.
I can tell you love little Eric...and my original post said if ANY drunk ever ........I would whip there ass and KPD would turn there back.....and I'm a bad guy...a freaking drunk would've killed my loved one.everyone was wanting Gary Christian to get a hold of those thugs that killed his daughter, what's the freaking difference here? Maybe a lot of You drink and drive? ?
The good news here is that by refusing to take the test, he automatically loses his license for a year. So at least we know he won't be killing himself or anyone else anytime soon, hopefully.
Actually I assumed you were a cop. And not a beat cop either.
Narcotics maybe. But it's not pertinent to the discussion.
Something tells me they aren't looking for keflex, and that you'll be alright.
And with that retarded argument of yours, I concede. Goodnight, sir.