Amateur Hour Continues

Nope. The red map is the only argument that matters with regard to the electoral college.
DEFINITELY RELEVANT.

Luther can never admit that those red maps show blue islands adrift in a sea of red. In reality those blue islands are floating asylums of unhinged bipolar libs who cluster together to try and help each other make it through another day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
LMAO Rocky! I really thought you were more grounded than this! Seriously, an emotional plea?! 😂

It was going to be Trump or Killary. I was resigned to the fact it would probably be Killary. I chose Gary Johnson but figured it was moot. And then Trump beat her and that was awesome. And he won because he was a better candidate. And I’ll take that 10 out of 10 times. 😎
I have no idea what you’re talking about, Don.
 
What would be the Constitutional basis for this limitation of you're tossing out the right of privacy?
It wouldn’t have to throw it out, it was always said to be a balance between the prenatal right to life, the mother’s health, and the right to privacy. This would just be an adjustment to that balance.

In terms of stare decisis, changing the decision is not something I love, but I don’t hate the idea of letting states decide what to offer.
 
It wouldn’t have to throw it out, it was always said to be a balance between the prenatal right to life, the mother’s health, and the right to privacy. This would just be an adjustment to that balance.

In terms of stare decisis, changing the decision is not something I love, but I don’t hate the idea of letting states decide what to offer.
It should be up to states. There’s no compelling reason for the feds to mandate this. Lawrence Tribe did a good writeup on it. And in Roe you don’t grant fourteenth amendment protections to the fetus while in UVVA2004 you do. Even the feds are inconsistent on the codified status of the fetus.
 
I was gonna accuse you of the same thing. And yeah it was pure feelz

I’ve read it twice and I’m totally at a loss as to where you’re getting this from or what you’re even talking about. If not drunk I assume you’re just trolling at this point. Good luck with that.
 
It wouldn’t have to throw it out, it was always said to be a balance between the prenatal right to life, the mother’s health, and the right to privacy. This would just be an adjustment to that balance.

But to do so it would have to much more explicitly define prenatal life.
 
But to do so it would have to much more explicitly define prenatal life.

I think it would leave that to the states. Initially having “life” defined differently in different states seems like an unwanted outcome but it seems like since we don’t require prenatal child support it would only really reverberate into probate law, potentially, not even sure that’s true, but that’s already different in every state.
 

VN Store



Back
Top