NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 56,658
- Likes
- 82,218
Nope. The red map is the only argument that matters with regard to the electoral college.
DEFINITELY RELEVANT.
Expect to be inundated with this crap in the lead up to the 2020 election
I have no idea what you’re talking about, Don.LMAO Rocky! I really thought you were more grounded than this! Seriously, an emotional plea?!
It was going to be Trump or Killary. I was resigned to the fact it would probably be Killary. I chose Gary Johnson but figured it was moot. And then Trump beat her and that was awesome. And he won because he was a better candidate. And I’ll take that 10 out of 10 times.
It wouldn’t have to throw it out, it was always said to be a balance between the prenatal right to life, the mother’s health, and the right to privacy. This would just be an adjustment to that balance.What would be the Constitutional basis for this limitation of you're tossing out the right of privacy?
It should be up to states. There’s no compelling reason for the feds to mandate this. Lawrence Tribe did a good writeup on it. And in Roe you don’t grant fourteenth amendment protections to the fetus while in UVVA2004 you do. Even the feds are inconsistent on the codified status of the fetus.It wouldn’t have to throw it out, it was always said to be a balance between the prenatal right to life, the mother’s health, and the right to privacy. This would just be an adjustment to that balance.
In terms of stare decisis, changing the decision is not something I love, but I don’t hate the idea of letting states decide what to offer.
But to do so it would have to much more explicitly define prenatal life.