rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,297
- Likes
- 24,317
I didn't say you can't be both, even though the two positions are actually diametrically opposed. One asks for limited government and the other asks the government to proclaim for us right and wrong. Makes no sense.
The anti abortion movement is a Christian coalition backed movement asking the government to enforce biblical views. Calling it anything but is simply intellectually dishonest.
I didn't say you can't be both, even though the two positions are actually diametrically opposed. One asks for limited government and the other asks the government to proclaim for us right and wrong. Makes no sense.
The anti abortion movement is a Christian coalition backed movement asking the government to enforce biblical views. Calling it anything but is simply intellectually dishonest.
I was asking CV, but personally, I could care less who marries whom. It makes not one iota of a difference to me.
In most cases, I think abortion is a personal choice to be made between involved parties.
Gay marraige-
Personally, it disgusts me, but it is not my say to tell someone else who they shall love.
Abortion-
Well, there are two ways I look at it. If you're a slut getting your weekend sex romp in and you want to use it as a way out of motherhood, then I have a big issue with it.
If its for medical reasons that will effect the life of the mother, then I am for it.
Again, my personal thoughts on a matter should not hinder someones right to self-expression or self-freedom.
What is good for one, may not be right for another!
Just as I dont tell Vegeterians that they cant eat carrots, in turn they should not be able to tell me to not eat beef.
What if there is and you cant do anything about it because the means has been outlawed?
What about the father, what if he wanted his child? Why doesn't he have a say?
I believe God decides, I don't want man playing God.
Like I said, why should not decide who lives and who dies, how does someone decide who's life is of more value. Besides I have heard a medical professional speak on this issue and he said this is no longer as issue due to the advancements in medical technology. You and I both know that abortions are there for the crack whores who have sex with everyone the meet and then don't want to take responsibilty for their actions.
Are we not playing God by telling others what they can or cannot do with their own bodies?
Again, we will all be judged for our sins and if we admit to those and ask for forgiveness, then we will be saved.
I don't think so because the mother is no the only party in the matter, there is another life involved here and what about the father he may want his child and he has zero say in the matter, that is wrong.
Agreed
Well!! I dont think its that easy
Until that baby is delivered and the cord is cut, then that baby is still part of the mother.
Only genetically, is the father attached to that child.
It could turn out to be one heck of a legal battle
Like I said, why should not decide who lives and who dies, how does someone decide who's life is of more value. Besides I have heard a medical professional speak on this issue and he said this is no longer as issue due to the advancements in medical technology. You and I both know that abortions are there for the crack whores who have sex with everyone the meet and then don't want to take responsibilty for their actions.