StepCross
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Messages
- 877
- Likes
- 38
No need to take it personally. All Hamilton's statement is is boilerplate PR-speak. If you translate it into English, all it says is "We were planning to keep him. There's been some other stuff since then that has forced us to change our mind." It's intentionally vague and therefore sinister because all the lawyering around it forces it to be devoid of actual content.
Disagree. I'm a fan of intentionally vague when appropriate; I'm also a fan of laying out the facts when appropriate.
This is neither. This is a calculated attempt to spin it in the worst light possible, presumably to get the fans off the athletic department's back.
Intentionally vague would be saying, "it has become clear that going forward with Pearl would be detrimental to our program." That's true, and enough to fire him.
Saying "violations in March" was deliberate, to make the masses think better of this firing.