Calling him my buddy. I take issue with anyone calling for the death of another. I didn't see the comment. What exactly was said and by whom?What's cute? Was the attempt on another man's life and the murder bystanders cute? Do you take issue with the comment literally made word for word on this board and by certain members of the media?
So where should this one have fallen in the "take seriously" continuum?You have no guess?
Some threats should be taken more seriously than others.
You guys need to be careful what you wish for.
Obviously it should have been taken more seriously in this instance.So where should this one have fallen in the "take seriously" continuum?
If someone calls up and says there is going to be a shooting at a school that day then it should always be taken seriously until confirmed or debunked. What exactly does that mindset need to be careful of?
Obviously it wasn't...and even moreso when reported before the shooting that it was gonna happen and it wasn't investigated properlyI think it was. There are thousands of threats made yearly. Every middle/high school continually deals with "threats":
A drawing in a notebook.
A LA paper about violence.
A list of names.
A post in social media.
A comment to a friend.
Viewing guns on your computer while at school.
Obviously it should have been taken more seriously in this instance.
What am I wishing for? A competent admin response when there's a direct threat of violence to a school? How is that so dangerous?Some threats should be taken more seriously than others.
You guys need to be careful what you wish for.
4 dead, 9 wounded. What's this, the second full week of school ? Off to a strong start with the NRA body count total for the year.
Shooter reporter 14 years old. A 14 year old able to obtain a gun. Sheesz.
At least this one will result in some sensible reforms. Except it won't.
What reforms do you want, what reforms do you suggest?
NRA is not even in the top 100 lobbyist so stop buying into that ********.
There are over 20,000 gun laws on the books, you'd think you might know this.
You cannot ban a semi automatic rifle, it's too broad of a brush and no one will turn them in.
No, it depends on what they do or don't do.
But surely, if a parent is told by officials that the kid is believed to have made threats, then ad long as that kid is under your roof, and you CHOOSE to keep guns under that same roof, it's on you to keep the kid from having any possible way to obtain them.
Imagine that you are the parent of a child who is murdered in a school shooting amd you find out that the shooter made threats a year ago, his parents knew, and his parents kept guns in the house, one of which was used to murder your child. I have zero doubt you'd want those parents, correctly, held in prison for a very long time.
I think I found the problem. The district should not worry about people looking at guns on line, and should start taking phone calls about shootings that specify what school and when, as serious threats.I think it was. There are thousands of threats made yearly. Every middle/high school continually deals with "threats":
A drawing in a notebook.
A LA paper about violence.
A list of names.
A post in social media.
A comment to a friend.
Viewing guns on your computer while at school.
Law enforcement should be held accountable for any mistakes they made, and as a parent, I am responsible for my kids actions until they are of age. Also, I am responsible for the firearms in my house.