landscapingvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
- Messages
- 11,571
- Likes
- 15,639
I too have known Nigerians that have come to this country and thrived (anecdotal, but it counts).I don't know what you're asking
There is discussion on both sides re: Asian Americans as a “real” minority right now.
Well Robin Diangelo for one. She’s a pretty big deal in the White Supremacy / Anti-racism circles.I know this is what you believe, but I'm asking for actual examples of real people saying Asians are not POC's and are not a minority group. Who is discussing this? You seem to be having this conversation with yourselves.
I don't doubt there is somebody out there saying this, but we're giving this attention like everybody who is in on CRT is taking this position, and I can't find one damn person.
In their latest equity report, administrators at North Thurston Public Schools—which oversees some 16,000 students—lumped Asians in with whites and measured their academic achievements against "students of color," a category that includes "Black, Latinx, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Multi-Racial Students" who have experienced "persistent opportunity gaps."
Robin DiAngelo, author of the now-infamous book White Fragility, defines it this way: "The closer you are to whiteness—the term often used is white-adjacent—you're still going to experience racism, but there are going to be some benefits due to your perceived proximity to whiteness. The further away you are, the more intense the oppression's going to be."And where did RD say that "Asian Americans are not POC's or 'real' minorities" ?
Robin DiAngelo, author of the now-infamous book White Fragility, defines it this way: "The closer you are to whiteness—the term often used is white-adjacent—you're still going to experience racism, but there are going to be some benefits due to your perceived proximity to whiteness. The further away you are, the more intense the oppression's going to be."
That's a free market approach. Let the market place figure out the balance. Under that system, America would have to "fail" immigrants who didn't make the cut by sending them back to their country of origin. Which of course, is another non-starter.
Legal immigrants and their children are very good at conforming to the system (which is what seems to be meant by white adjacency) and being productive. I've seen data that shows they outperform native-born Americans, at large. This is not unique at all to Asian Americans.
Robin DiAngelo, author of the now-infamous book White Fragility, defines it this way: "The closer you are to whiteness—the term often used is white-adjacent—you're still going to experience racism, but there are going to be some benefits due to your perceived proximity to whiteness. The further away you are, the more intense the oppression's going to be."
If Harvard wants their student body to reflect what America looks like, I do not view that as a penalty for success. I just view it as a quota.
Who is actually saying Asians are not POC's?