Tenacious D
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,336
- Likes
- 1
Is that the end of that movie? I gave up with about 15 minutes left.
Yes. He makes it to the top of the tower and it was all a ploy to get him to regain reality. He realizes his wife killed his kids and he killed her and now he's here. He blames himself for his kids deaths because he knew she was bi-polar and still left her alone with the kids. In the end he pretends to be insane and walks off to get lobotomized.
Horrible, horrible movie. Too long. Too drawn out. And a serious end of movie that had my wife and I looking at each are saying what the hell was that.
Can you effectively and empirically prove the existence of God?
If not now, when?
If not ever, why debate and/or "spread the word".
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Well, I may be inclined to one day relinquish that title. D's out to piss off both sides. However, I'm finding enjoyment in it.
You are telling me to prove something that doesn't exist, doesn't exist. It's like a bad Monty python skit. The burden of proof is not on a null hypothesis, but on the alternative.
My proof ends with, "else not reject."
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I think, therefore I am.
I'm reading this forum. One cannot read in a dream, as that comes from the opposite hemisphere of the brain.
you are reading this forum, so likewise you are not dreaming.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You're wrong! Had to do that.
I would say that "insecurity" falls more under the need that everything must be proven "right," as opposed to allowing someone to have their belief, and keep said belief.
If you are secure in your beliefs, you won't mind that someone else has another belief. However, you might still debate with the individual, not to prove them wrong, or to prove yourself right, but to give the other side the benefit of your own.
And, as I haven't finished reading this thread yet, this question may have been answered, and if so, I apologize. That said, where do you stand?
But neither side wants the other opposing opinion, thus these discussions devolve into name-calling and the destruction of the others argument, and toward the continued failing of supporting their own.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Can I show him to you? No.
Can I have him audibly talk to you where you know it is no one other than? No.
Will you and I meet him one day? Yes.
For most Hellfire?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Can you effectively and empirically prove this to be true?
You cannot be certain yourself that it is.....or what's the need of faith?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Oddly, he picked such opposite sides on both angles that there is no burning. None of us are actually going at it even though he keeps trying to create Threadamania.
If you believe in Christ or are a Christian because you want to avoid hell then chances are you are not actually saved. I can not stand hellfire preachers. Hell is in the Bible but some of us believe it will have gnassing of teeth and total darkness and fire because it will be void and seperate of God with no Holy Spirit and you will be stuck there forever knowing that there is a God and that you could have been with him but chose not to. That is my view of hell. An eternal seperation from God. Not here you go burn mother phucker burn.
Can I prove future prophecy? Right now? No.
Whats my need for faith in correlation to being a christian? Everything. I can't take credit for that.
Confuses by someone taking an objective stand from a readily defensible, though possibly unpopular position.
I can understand your confusion.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Isn't the need for faith only so much proof that you will never be able to be proven correct in your belief as to the existence of God?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
When I look at everything around me, I don't get a sense of randomness being the instigator. That leads me to believe that there is purpose to me, and everything around me. If I believe that, there is something out there bigger than me that has a purpose.