That may not have been the original goal. But it is easy to see how someone could think it is the goal these days. The disenfranchisement is a known byproduct of a policy that is known to be innefective. Why continue an ineffective policy with known byproducts unless the byproducts are at least a secondary goal of the policy?
One group commits the most visiblecrime. One group populates the majority of prisons. Sounds like it's working.
I guarantee there are a lot more law breakers among whites than any other group. The rate of crime committing may not be the highest, but by our shear numbers, whites commit the most crimes, and it can't be close, because there are so many laws that we all break them. There is 4 year's worth of reading in the tax code. We all certainly violate the tax code in one way or another. It just goes unenforced. The laws that are enforced are more visible, and those happen to be crimes that inner city people get busted for.
It's like Omar Little said, brief case (in reference to the crooked lawyer) or shotgun, the tool doesn't matter, a thief is a thief. People in the hood know all about white collar thieves and then they see people in their hood getting their spines severed over nothing, and is it really surprising that they want justice?
Ehhh, while I agree that we need to eliminate, change our drug laws I disagree that they are in place to disenfranchise any particular group.
How are laws designed to disenfranchise a particular group of people? Are you saying violent crimes, armed robbery, burglary, drug dealing, drug usage, and more are designed to target blacks and not criminals? I know where your opinion belongs.
That may not have been the original goal. But it is easy to see how someone could think it is the goal these days. The disenfranchisement is a known byproduct of a policy that is known to be innefective. Why continue an ineffective policy with known byproducts unless the byproducts are at least a secondary goal of the policy?
The crack laws in the 1980's were designed specifically to do that. That has been proven through leaked CIA documents. That's all I am saying: these laws are designed to disenfranchise black voters by making them felons. In the end, the result will be massive amounts of violence directed towards the police because said ethnic group believes that they are being unfairly treated (and in most cases I believe they are).
But please, if you think I am making excuses for these thieves to do this, I am not. Please refer to my post a few pages back. I just understand why it is happening, or at least I think I do.
The looting is nothing more than taking advantage of the situation.
I'm all good with these groups going to war against the police if they choose, they have legitimate grievances. But if they choose to use violence no one should feel sorry for them.
The crack laws in the 1980's were designed specifically to do that. That has been proven through leaked CIA documents. That's all I am saying: these laws are designed to disenfranchise black voters by making them felons. In the end, the result will be massive amounts of violence directed towards the police because said ethnic group believes that they are being unfairly treated (and in most cases I believe they are).
But please, if you think I am making excuses for these thieves to do this, I am not. Please refer to my post a few pages back. I just understand why it is happening, or at least I think I do.
No, I am saying that the drug laws of this country are disproportionately designed to hurt one particular group, and it has worked for the past 30 years. What you are seeing now is the issue coming to a head.
This is one of the reasons I like Rand Paul: is for instituting the right to vote back to some convicted felons that committed non-violent crimes, specifically drug laws.
How is civil disobedience going to change the AA community?
You mean illegal drug users and distributors?
So are the breaking and entering or grand theft laws disenfranchising anyone?
The same way it changed the education, transportation, entertainment, and voting systems of the 1950's and 60's: expose the inequality of drug laws by mass demonstrations to make the government evolve. That's the only way things will change; just annoy the f out of the govt until they do what you want. They will never get what they desire by burning buildings and stealing TV's, and Dr. King knew that.
Civil disobedience may change the drug laws, which I support massive overhaul. But the problems within the AA community go far beyond the drug laws.