red butler
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,617
- Likes
- 1,110
What is your point other than to detract from mine? I didn't say the war on drugs started with Nancy. I didn't say Nancy held office. If I called it "your war on drugs" I would not be implying you held office, I would be implying you supported the cause and furthered it.
So what is this about the graph now? More time-wasting?
I'll just drop this here. I'm sure most won't read it, but just in case...
From Ferguson to Baltimore: The Fruits of Government-Sponsored Segregation | Economic Policy Institute
One of the things I learned living in "progressive" Chicago was that segregation is the order of the day. When people learned I was from the South they loved to tell me about how racist the South was. I tried to explain how much more integrated the South actually is but they wouldn't buy it. They didn't use the "n" word but they might as well have. One guy thought he was clever by calling black people "Canadians" so he could make comments about them in public without being racist...
Bottomline, hard to imagine more government is the solution when more government is a big reason we are where we are.
One of the things I learned living in "progressive" Chicago was that segregation is the order of the day. When people learned I was from the South they loved to tell me about how racist the South was. I tried to explain how much more integrated the South actually is but they wouldn't buy it. They didn't use the "n" word but they might as well have. One guy thought he was clever by calling black people "Canadians" so he could make comments about them in public without being racist...
Bottomline, hard to imagine more government is the solution when more government is a big reason we are where we are.
Hampsterdam was beginning to work as intended. The arrest free zone became a cesspool but the rest of Baltimore began to thrive. I don't know how true to life The Wire was though.
Expenditures jumped roughly 5 billion during both Regan's and Clinton's terms, yet you single out Nancy?
^ This times ∞One of the things I learned living in "progressive" Chicago was that segregation is the order of the day. When people learned I was from the South they loved to tell me about how racist the South was. I tried to explain how much more integrated the South actually is but they wouldn't buy it. They didn't use the "n" word but they might as well have. One guy thought he was clever by calling black people "Canadians" so he could make comments about them in public without being racist...
Bottomline, hard to imagine more government is the solution when more government is a big reason we are where we are.
$5 billion was 300% of the budget when Reagan took over. It wasn't even 50% of the budget when Clinton took over. In case you can't tell by the slope, the rate of spending increase slowed down under Clinton.
The Clintons deserve blame for their part in expanding it, but it would have been politically unpopular to de-escalate, because the Reagans' anti-drugs campaign was so convincing. The Reagans made the war on drugs extremely popular. People bought into it, because of them.
I don't mean to single any administration out, but Reagan and Bush did the most damage and deserve more blame than any other POTUS.
Man I've been pounding beer all day and working my yard and STILL I say: MATH!!!! Lern it gud!
So lets say:
1 billion to 3 billion...= 200% increase OMG THE WORLD IS BURNING!!
12 billion to 17 billion = OMG 40% increase..um..ok thats ok!!..................................................................................................................hmy::ermm::unsure:
Response? Argh Republicans 200% rabble rabble blah blah etc etc
You're doing math like it's a family budget or a company's finances. This is government.
Basically, every government program sees increases in spending, under every POTUS. You would expect Clinton to increase the rate of spending, if the Ds were as bad as the Rs, but the rate slowed under him...
Round 2?
@greta: BREAKING NEWS: man shot in Baltimore by police
@greta: young black male shot in Baltimore by police witnessed by Fox crew
@greta: man shot appeared to be alive, but in bad shape after shot and moved to ambulance
@greta: shooting in baltimore was about 10 minutes ago;was running from police when shot
@greta: Fox crew saw revolver on sidewalk
@greta: police stood guard over revolver as other police arrived
@greta: @MikeTobinFox saw man run, never saw him do anything aggressive and police shot once
@greta: big crowd formed around victim after shot; per @MikeTobinFox
@greta: @MikeTobinFox says very angry crowd formed around shot man police arrived ambulance and man taken away
What if instead of pulling out, they just enforce laws against property crime and violence?
If that were the case, Gray would probably only have 1 assault charge on his record. How many UT athletes had an assault charge at some point? I don't get this attitude you have about Baltimore. The war on drugs has destroyed their community, so now they don't get any police protection? How about scaling back the war on drugs first, before we abandon Baltimore altogether?
The Grey case is a constitutional fiasco. A guy walking down the street approached by the authorities becauseliterallyhe looked at them? Hes pursued, frisked, found in the legal possession of a weapon (a pocketknife) and is arrested? No crime? No theoretical charge of a crime?
Then hes shackled, laid on the floor of a police van on his stomachunsecured and in violation of police rulesand bounced around the city for hours, while being repeatedly denied requested medical treatment.
Our founders committed a truly revolutionary act when they wrote a Constitution that is a document of No. It tells agents of the government, No, you cant. It doesnt matter if the citizen is a pillar of the community or a punk. Hes still an American, so hands off!
Conservatives taught me that the founders understood we needed the Constitution specifically to protect the rights of Americans the government considered bad.
I'm not up to speed on this whole issue, but some of the reading I have done suggested that this man was a snitch. It implied that he would often make a scene while being "arrested" to sell it.
This is why I believe he was not restrained while in the vehicle.
Like I said, I'm not up to speed