For OE.
Best counter argument yet. However, simply because there is no record, in the Bible, that the Apostles forgave sinners does not mean it did not happen. Catholic bishops were forgiving sinners while Peter was still the See of Rome. Therefore, he, who was attendent to Jesus for before mentioned John passage and who was given the key to the kingdom of heaven along with the power to bind on earth and it shall be bound in heaven, condoned said act.
Unfortunately, you can't prove a negative. With the clarity of John 20, protestants are put in that position.
The order of creation in Genesis 1 is: heaven and earth, light, vault of heaven (i.e., separation of earthly and heavenly waters), seas and dry land, plants, sun and stars, fish and birds, land animals, and last humans. This order is the same as that of the Persian Zend-Avesta, the sacred book of the Zoroastrians. Zoroastrianism was a powerful religion at about the time of the priestly writer of Genesis. However, Zoroaster probably lived about 1000 BCE, and the Yahwist writer would be unlikely to have had any contact with the Avesta. The original Avesta has not survived; modern adherents of Zoroastrianism use a version that has been recreated from fragments, commentaries, and hymns. The order of creation in Egyptian mythology, which would surely have been familiar to the priestly author, is ocean, sun, atmosphere, earth, and sky.
The order of creation in Genesis 2 is: heaven and earth, man, trees and the Garden of Eden, animals and birds, woman. In Genesis 1 the earth is first covered by water. In Genesis 2 the earth is first dry and barren. In Genesis 1 God creates by simple command: "And God said, let there be light, and there was light." In Genesis 2 God manufactures his creations from dirt or earth, walks in the garden in the cool of the evening, and cannot find the humans when they are hiding. Not only are the creation stories inconsistent, but the conceptions of the power of the deity are utterly different.
Now the Lord had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.
So.........
Not only is the story of creation recorded twice in Genesis, but shorter versions of it are recorded in Psalm 104 and Proverbs 8:22-31.
Bible stories are usually recorded to teach particular lessons rather than merely to provide facts and events. We can learn lessons about God the creator from each of these stories.
I will let Jesus' words stand as they are.
Also, I do not need to further back up anything. I will again, let what I have posted, from Scripture, stand for all to read and come to their own conclusions.
For OE.
Best counter argument yet. However, simply because there is no record, in the Bible, that the Apostles forgave sinners does not mean it did not happen. Catholic bishops were forgiving sinners while Peter was still the See of Rome. Therefore, he, who was attendent to Jesus for before mentioned John passage and who was given the key to the kingdom of heaven along with the power to bind on earth and it shall be bound in heaven, condoned said act.
Unfortunately, you can't prove a negative. With the clarity of John 20, protestants are put in that position.
As a former Christian myself, you all pose some very interesting questions. They have peeked my interest so much that I plan to attend service on Sunday. It's been over two years since I've picked up a bible. Divorce(my parents) really reared its ugly head when it distracted me from my faith. Something's been missing in my life for a while. When I go into the Coast Guard over the summer, I plan to restore my faith and happiness again. The happiest times of my life were when I was a devoted Christian.
This could cause more discussion because of different denominations but you can't be a former Christian. If you "heard" and "believed" then your name is written in the Book of Life and won't be taken out.
Romans 10:5-13
Ephesians 1:13-14 "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the Word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having BELIEVED you were MARKED in Him with a SEAL, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a DEPOSIT GUARANTEEING our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God's possession..."
This could cause more discussion because of different denominations but you can't be a former Christian. If you "heard" and "believed" then your name is written in the Book of Life and won't be taken out.
Romans 10:5-13
Ephesians 1:13-14 "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the Word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having BELIEVED you were MARKED in Him with a SEAL, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a DEPOSIT GUARANTEEING our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God's possession..."
I would think that walking through those doors would be the easiest thing you could do.You're correct. It was the wrong term to use in that instance. I was basically saying it's been almost two years since I've set a foot in God's temple. Mostly because I couldn't live a double life. I couldn't walk into his house while I was betraying his word during the week. But I'm in a better situation as of now. And I think it's time I take advantage of it. It just feels like something is missing currently. And I know what it is...but it's going to be hard to walking through those doors again.(Neglecting my faith before)
It was after his death and resurrection. I am sure you knew that though...And again one section of John taken out of context being your basis says your argument is wrong.
But I will go with you to see this logic out. If Christ, before he died, gave the Disciples power to forgive sin, what was the point of his death and resurrection? Because if the power was given before all of these events, there would be no need for any of it. And again, if Christ is there to forgive only by praying, why bother going through a priest? I mean if I have a choice, why not go directly to the source? What is the point of the priest in asking for forgiveness if they are not needed?
I do not believe that the word IF would greatly change the implied empowerment Jesus bestowed on the Apostles. It just provides the Apostles with the discretion to absolve, retain, or defer the matter to Christ, another Apostle, or a later date.Without proof how can you say it DID happen? You are basing your argument on "just because it never said it didn't happen".
As for the binding on earth and heaven, what do you think it means and what is being bound here?
You still have John 20 as your only basis. Go to the original greek and read that whole chapter. Notice the word IF used there. It is not a command or entitling anyone to power. By your logic a priest has the power to tie the sins to that person (note second part). What if this person has already gone to Christ in prayer? Doesn't that pose a problem?
Again, man has no power to forgive sin in the level Christ does.