southgatevol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,573
- Likes
- 2,104
sure they do. Seems the left has used that tactic before too and it’s deemed as credible unless you run the full clip. But why do that. Whips, boarder patrol agents and Hatian immigrants.Of course, it does. They creatively edit videos to suit their agenda.
The Mainstream media who admittedly suppressed Hunter Biden’s laptop to protect Biden would definitely promote and spread the contents of this diary if harmful to him. Sound logicThere is not a report in The New York Times which has confirmed that Ashley Biden wrote passages in her diary about being molested by her dad. There are reports in The New York Times that have confirmed the existence of the diary, but not its contents. You are dead wrong. On other sources, you might have a chance here... but not The Gray Lady. I read it every day.
Post a link to Fox News verifying the contents of Ashley Biden's diary. I don't believe you.
Fox news did report on it. There 40 different entries reporting on it. You must have missed them all.
It won't turn into a "raging fire" as long as it stays in the realm of sources like Project Veritas, National File and The Gateway Pundit. However, if a more high-profile source picks it up, then you have to act ... assuming it isn't true.
I will believe what Fox News, The Washington Times, National Review or The Daily Caller report. Those aren't liberal outlets.The Mainstream media who admittedly suppressed Hunter Biden’s laptop to protect Biden would definitely promote and spread the contents of this diary if harmful to him. Sound logic
There were many elements to the Russia/2016 Trump campaign collusion story. Based on the June 9, 2016 meeting a Trump Tower, and Donald Trump Jr.'s e-mails with Rob Goldstone, who arranged the meeting, I believe that the Trump campaign tried to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton, from Russian operatives. The Trump campaign was willing to engage in collusion. There just isn't any proof that anything ever changed hands.Did you believe the Russian Collusion story? Do you deny the Hunter Biden laptop story?
Was it the NYT or WSJ that ran an opinion piece by R- Scott to be viewed by Chuck Schumer first on if it could be ran?I gotta say the least believable thing in this thread is BB saying if a story is in the NYT he would know it because he's a subscriber. I subscribe to the WSJ but I'm pretty sure it contains stories I didn't read
LOL.I gotta say the least believable thing in this thread is BB saying if a story is in the NYT he would know it because he's a subscriber. I subscribe to the WSJ but I'm pretty sure it contains stories I didn't read
I really do not care about any of the players we are discussing. Just trying to assist you in seeing your inconsistencies or hypocrisy. You do what you accuse everyone else on here of doing. In other words, you believe the portions of news you want to believe.There were many elements to the Russia/2016 Trump campaign collusion story. Based on the June 9, 2016 meeting a Trump Tower, and Donald Trump Jr.'s e-mails with Rob Goldstone, who arranged the meeting, I believe that the Trump campaign tried to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton, from Russian operatives. The Trump campaign was willing to engage in collusion. There just isn't any proof that anything ever changed hands.
I've never really paid much attention to the Hunter Biden laptop story, and I don't understand why you guys like to talk about him so much.
Not true. I believe e-mails. I believe it when there is evidence.I really do not care about any of the players we are discussing. Just trying to assist you in seeing your inconsistencies or hypocrisy. You do what you accuse everyone else on here of doing. In other words, you believe the portions of news you want to believe.
Except he dresses it up with italics so it must be true.I really do not care about any of the players we are discussing. Just trying to assist you in seeing your inconsistencies or hypocrisy. You do what you accuse everyone else on here of doing. In other words, you believe the portions of news you want to believe.
There were many elements to the Russia/2016 Trump campaign collusion story. Based on the June 9, 2016 meeting a Trump Tower, and Donald Trump Jr.'s e-mails with Rob Goldstone, who arranged the meeting, I believe that the Trump campaign tried to obtain dirt on Hillary Clinton, from Russian operatives. The Trump campaign was willing to engage in collusion. There just isn't any proof that anything ever changed hands.
I've never really paid much attention to the Hunter Biden laptop story, and I don't understand why you guys like to talk about him so much.
Whats apalling to me is the fact that you are basically admitting that this diary is real and yet you have absolutely no concerns about the content of the diary and that Joe Biden is indeed a filthy sick man who wanted to take showers with his 11 uear old daughter. Is their any wonder his son is a crackhead.
I don't either. My chastisement is to his name calling and inconsistencies. Defend him if you feel the need.You guys are chastising BB for responding to legal arguments. Nobody in this thread had talked about this component to this point, so why is he responsible for addressing it? I got this far in the thread wondering what the hell is in the diary. Still don't know, but I'll keep reading.