n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 88,249
- Likes
- 53,202
The original nominations from Taylor were Terrance and Indy.
Huffines is purposely going out of his way to defend racism.
Double standard is right because, let's be honest, it is perfectly okay to say let's team up against the whiteys.Man, this stuff is a shame. When Kyle was saying that ****, I was like, "What are you doing sheltered Utah boy?" It's not fair, but people were going to take it the wrong way. Michael is using it for game play, which is gross.
It's a double standard but this is the way the world works...you can't essentially say let's team up against the minorities.
I feel for the kid.
Just getting caught up after missing this week. Man, Kyle has to be more aware than to say that out loud. Michael using it for gameplay though is weak. He literally said he sat on it for 2 weeks, but then claims the moral high ground. If you truly think what he said was morally wrong you don’t wait until a moment it benefits you personally to say something.
I agree. Sheri Restone wanted more diversity. She’s gotten it. As well as poor demographic ratings.Anyone notice that on tonight's episode, Terrance proposed to Monte the people of color form an alliance? Monte didn't tell the rest of the house about it.
I don't like that race has become such a big part of this game.
I’m talking about the actual demographic breakdown for the show. Ages, location, time spent viewing, return viewing, lifestyle, buying habits, all of which are either lower than desired or lacking viewers from “money” demographics.?
Not sure what you mean but it's been viewed over 8.3b minutes and it's the biggest attraction to P+'s 43m subscribers
View attachment 488109
I’m talking about the actual demographic breakdown for the show. Ages, location, time spent viewing, return viewing, lifestyle, buying habits, all of which are either lower than desired or lacking viewers from “money” demographics.
But I’m sure you have your own audit, which contradicts all others.
You clearly have no idea how advertising works. They pay $ for specific ages, incomes, time spent viewing and impressions per x. According to Neilsen as well as half a dozen broadcast media websites, reporting auditing sources, the series has been delivering less than desired and/or promised.I do not have my own audit. I'd love to see the audit you're talking about. What specifically makes their demographic breakdown "poor" ?
Not sure being a "money demographic" matters too much when you're getting 8b minutes of viewing from paid subscribers.
You clearly have no idea how advertising works. They pay $ for specific ages, incomes, time spent viewing and impressions per x. According to Neilsen as well as half a dozen broadcast media websites, reporting auditing sources, the series has been delivering less than desired and/or promised.
Those are what are called “boxcars”. Get out of the Mesozoic era.Lol, it's CBS's 3rd biggest show in the 18-49 demo, and it's on 3x week.
CBS 2021-22 TV Season Ratings (updated 9/8/2022)
Where are your audits, bro?