Bruce Pearl is a better basketball coach than Kevin O'Neill

If you get a head job in the NBA, you're an elite tactician.

O'Neill didn't even make it through the season before he was fired.That shows how much you know about elite tactitions.His head coaching experience was horrible.Good god the hatevol minions keep showing their ignorance
 
The USC job is a good job. The Arizona gig is a fantastic job. The Toronto Raptors is a job that about 95+% of coaches in the NCAA would take. I'm not saying he's the best coach of all time, but you're kidding yourself if you think he isn't solid.

Arizona was just a one year gig and he was sub .500 in conference play. I would be shocked if 50% of NCAA coaches would want to take the Raptors job! College coaches are turning down NBA jobs more and more every year.
 
If south gets us a free throw from the final 4, I'm going down.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Dont be senseless. Our draw couldn't have been better and MSU was gift wrapped without their best player. We gagged.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Bo Ryan is an absolute Hell of a coach. If I remember correctly, Bruce's best players in his Sweet 16 year were Redshirt Seniors that Bo Ryan recruited. Pearl need a nice job, but Ryan gets some credit for that as well.

McCants was their best player and was a senior that didn't play until Bruce got there and averaged 17 ppg.

Tucker didn't do anything until Pearl got there.

So pretty much you have a team that couldn't do anything until Pearl was their coach, and you give credit to Bo Ryan.

I guess Buzz was the one that brought TN out of the dumpster then since he had Lofton, Watson, Smith, etc... here.
 
Dont be senseless. Our draw couldn't have been better and MSU was gift wrapped without their best player. We gagged.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

O'Neill must have had some horrible draws in his day.

I haven't said Bruce is the best coach in the country. I have said he's better than O'Neill.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
The team won 34 games in the 5 years prior to Ryan taking over. He won 29 in two.

If you can't respect that then I've got nothing to say.

Yet, it got them nothing more than a 4th place finish. Yet, when Bruce came and brought about as different of a style as you can, all of a sudden you are saying Bo Ryan recruited players were more suited for Pearl's offense rather than his own.
 
HatNation member. Can't spell the coach's name, yet defends him to the end.

Thanks for your input. Actually, I'm trying to work and check out threads during lax times. Sorry about the spelling. I can't spell, but at least I know something about basketball and coaching. That's certainly more than I can say about you. Keep to the spell check mode, that's about all you are good for.
 
Clearly beating the Texas, Kansas, and memphises of the world when they are at the top mean nothing to you.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Sure they do, but they aren't difference makers. Regular season OOC wins are nice, but generally mean little. They don't validate Pearl's coaching in the slightest to me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
O'Neill must have had some horrible draws in his day.

I haven't said Bruce is the best coach in the country. I have said he's better than O'Neill.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

A game to win and need of a coach for the week, there is no way to justify taking Pearl.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Obviously Bo Ryan is a hack of a coach hat. How dare you suggest othewise.

When has anyone suggested Bo Ryan was a hack. However, if you are going to give him credit for bringing UWM back (with players that didn't even play until Pearl got there) then you need to say Buzz brought back TN.
 
Sure they do, but they aren't difference makers. Regular season OOC wins are nice, but generally mean little. They don't validate Pearl's coaching in the slightest to me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

What could possibly validate it? Occasionally making a NCAA tournament and promptly losing in the 1st round? Winning 5 games in your 3rd season at a job?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
What could possibly validate it? Occasionally making a NCAA tournament and promptly losing in the 1st round? Winning 5 games in your 3rd season at a job?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Obviously what validates a coach is:

1. Getting an NBA job with a team that has a history of pathetic coaching and personnel moves.

2. Being 205-207 with one Sweet 16.

That's what it takes, just deal with it :)
 
When has anyone suggested Bo Ryan was a hack. However, if you are going to give him credit for bringing UWM back (with players that didn't even play until Pearl got there) then you need to say Buzz brought back TN.

Back from what? A team that had won 20+ games 4 straight seasons and made the tournament 4 straight seasons with a blithering idiot as head coeach when he took over to a team that averaged 15 wins a year for 4 years?

Good grief. That's ridiculous to even compare the two.
 
He never won anything close to what pearl has. He didn't win at Oregon or UNC Asheville either. Pearl has won at every stop.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I'm not the biggest Green fan, but the stats say:

Green did have a winning record at Oregon (72-70), UNC-A (150 - 108), and UT.

Green's record at UT (4 years): 89-36 (.712 win %)
- 1 Eastern Div title
- 1 SEC Regular season title
- NCAA appearance every year he was here

Pearl's record at UT (6 years): 145 - 60 (.707 win %)
- 2 Eastern Div titles
- 1 SEC Regular season title
- NCAA appearance every year he was here

Bruce does have a tendency to get about 1 game further in the NCAA tourney each year before getting bounced. Otherwise they are pretty close.
 
Stomped a couple mudholes in Pearl.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

So now Bruce Pearl is a better coach than Billy Donovan, since we are going to base head to head stats.

Want me to go into the coaches in the Pac-10 that have a better head to head record than O'Neill?
 

VN Store



Back
Top