If the school dedicates the resources, it absolutely can have a consistent top 20 program. It is all about what they are willing to pay.
Yeah, we really paid the going rate to hire Houston, Green, and Peterson. I love people acting like paying K Mart wages had nothing to do with our awful basketball hires.
Yeah, we really paid the going rate to hire Houston, Green, and Peterson. I love people acting like paying K Mart wages had nothing to do with our awful basketball hires.
I thought we were talking about basketball. The investment in the BB program has totally changed since Dickey left.
This is a much better job than it was 5 years ago. Much credit goes to Pearl and some to Hamilton with the facility upgrades.
Read an earlier post: With the facilities, fanbase, money, recent success, and recruiting base, we can be successful without Bruce.
Let's say this: The blind loyalty the guy is receiving makes me scratch my head. I don't know if the next guy can. He'll have a great opportunity because, right now, UT is a great place to coach basketball (thanks, in large part, to Bruce Pearl). But like I said, my point is that he really hasn't done anything transcendent, but people are willing to risk a postseason ban to keep him. That, that's just sad.
If the concept that paying competitive wages greaty increases your chances of hiring talented personnel is so revolutionary to you, being smarter than you is no great feat.Maybe you should be an adviser to the UT board on all hiring decisions. You obviously are way smarter than everyone here and at UT.
zjc, you are all over the map bro! We had the facilities, the fanbase, the money with ONeill, Green and Buzz....um, how successful were we?Read an earlier post: With the facilities, fanbase, money, recent success, and recruiting base, we can be successful without Bruce.