Crazy Ivan
Carpe Jugulum
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 8,558
- Likes
- 16,860
Wrong. Previously counting toward annual limits at a school that a transfer leaves does not exempt that transfer from counting toward annual limits at his new school. That's a message board myth. There is no such provision in the NCAA Bylaws.Wrong. A transfer is not an initial counter. They have already counted in their original class. Suck it.
Wrong. it most definitely does unless its a GRAD transfer. did hurd count against baylors 17class? No. Otherwise why would you take a transfer and use up a spot when the kid has to sit out that year? Spots are for initial counters, if you graduate that resets you to an initial counter. Go back to your coloring book.Wrong. Previously counting at another school does not exempt an incoming transfer from counting toward the limits at the school a player is transfering to.
You cannot quote anything from the NCAA Bylaws that proves you're right -- because it doesn't exist. The NCAA Bylaws are not a coloring book.Wrong. it most definitely does unless its a GRAD transfer. did hurd count against baylors 17class? No. Otherwise why would you take a transfer and use up a spot when the kid has to sit out that year? Spots are for initial counters, if you graduate that resets you to an initial counter. Go back to your coloring book.
Boom!Wrong. it most definitely does unless its a GRAD transfer. did hurd count against baylors 17class? No. Otherwise why would you take a transfer and use up a spot when the kid has to sit out that year? Spots are for initial counters, if you graduate that resets you to an initial counter. Go back to your coloring book.
That is not the reason recruiting sites only include HS and Juco players for class ranking purposes. Undergrad and grad transfers aren't included because their rankings as recruits were from a different year. It certainly doesn't prove incoming undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signings and initial counter limits. I posted the NCAA Bylaws sections that prove they do count. Idk why you call the pertinent NCAA Bylaws bogus. What's actually bogus is the erroneous notion (perpetuated on message boards) that undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signing and initial counter limits. It appears to me you've been mislead by other posters who were wrong about it.then why doesnt he show up in our class rankings on the recruiting sites? Why? BECAUSE HE DOESNT COUNT TOWARD THE CLASS. You should find a better coloring book that bogus bylaw one sounds boring and you still cant stay inside the lines.
That is not the reason recruiting sites only include HS and Juco players for class ranking purposes. Undergrad and grad transfers aren't included because their rankings as recruits were from a different year. It certainly doesn't prove incoming undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signings and initial counter limits. I posted the NCAA Bylaws sections that prove they do count. Idk why you call the pertinent NCAA Bylaws bogus. What's actually bogus is the erroneous notion (perpetuated on message boards) that undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signing and initial counter limits. It appears to me you've been mislead by other posters who were wrong.
This really has you upset.That is not the reason recruiting sites only include HS and Juco players for class ranking purposes. Undergrad and grad transfers aren't included because their rankings as recruits were from a different year. It certainly doesn't prove incoming undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signings and initial counter limits. I posted the NCAA Bylaws sections that prove they do count. Idk why you call the pertinent NCAA Bylaws bogus. What's actually bogus is the erroneous notion (perpetuated on message boards) that undergrad transfers don't count toward annual signing and initial counter limits. It appears to me you've been mislead by other posters who were wrong.
You need to read the whole sentence there bub. If they’ve aready signed a NLI in FBS, then they are no longer an initial qualifier and thus just a qualifier.For the football bowl subdivision, there shall be an annual limit of 25...who may sign a financial aid agreement for the first time.
Nope (assuming "counter" is what you meant when you said "qualifer"). It's understandable that some people misinterpret "for the first time" in that way. However, the words "for the first time" refer to both "prospective student-athletes" (HS) and "student-athletes" (transfers) receiving a new countable scholarship at the school providing it.You need to read the whole sentence there bub. If they’ve aready signed a NLI in FBS, then they are no longer an initial qualifier and thus just a qualifier.
Not sure why grad transfers are handled differently, but I don’t really care. All I know is that they count. Not worth my time to research it beyond what I’ve already spent on it.