California ban on same-sex marriage struck down

#78
#78
I dont imagine that you are a child which is easily influenced . All you have to do is watch the spring break stuff thats shown on TV and you'll see otherwise normal kids who are influenced by drugs, alcohol and peir pressure doing things that is most influenced by our society accepting this behavior . seriously
now that you mention it, there are some strange websites with nekkid teen gals, who appear spaced out, doing some things that probably aren't natural. Wonder if they knew this decision by the CA courts was coming?
 
#82
#82
now that you mention it, there are some strange websites with nekkid teen gals, who appear spaced out, doing some things that probably aren't natural. Wonder if they knew this decision by the CA courts was coming?

What I've seen are not the websites you've been looking at , what i've seen is on mainstream TV ( same place the kids I speak of probably saw it )

Society acceptance has everything to with the rate of progression imo . Just for instance 20 years ago you very seldom saw a mixed racial couple in these parts , but since society has become more tolerant of this I have seen more and more and on a regular basis. This does not bother me but it is the way our society works .
 
#83
#83
What I've seen are not the websites you've been looking at , what i've seen is on mainstream TV ( same place the kids I speak of probably saw it )

Society acceptance has everything to with the rate of progression imo . Just for instance 20 years ago you very seldom saw a mixed racial couple in these parts , but since society has become more tolerant of this I have seen more and more and on a regular basis. This does not bother me but it is the way our society works .

but homosexuality is more than just a decision for people. itams not the same as things that might have been taboo but moral standards slid to make them more acceptable.
 
#88
#88
my view is based on the Bible...which science does not compete....over and out!
 
#89
#89
that might be true, but I don't see homo v hetero as some morality issue. I think it's a nature issue.

I agree with you in part here bpv , about the natural part , but I still believe there are kids doing this stuff who are not naturally homosexual , and society is more acceptive now so it dont seem as wrong to them
 
#90
#90
my view is based on the Bible...which science does not compete....over and out!
Well then, I guess you have me there. The Bible supposedly rails on homosexuality, so obviously those who struggle all their lives trying to be someone they are not are just masochists. They could easily just decide the other way, right? They just enjoy that it rips up families and makes them outcasts at home.

isn't it more comfortable when science validates things in the Bible?
 
#91
#91
IMO it illegitimizes heterosexual marriage. The intent of marriage is for the family institution, perpetuation of family, and basically continuting heritage. When john and john or lucy and lucy get married what is accomplished? Nothing.. The homos only want this because they know it bothers about 90 percent of the population who are disgusted when they look at them and turn their childrens heads when they publicly display their affection for each other. The mere presence of homos publicly displaying their affection turns my stomach, I wasn't taught this it is just a natural feeling for me as it may be just the opposite for you. It is something that I completely disagree with. Homosexuality began in the closet and in the closet it must stay.

Maybe California can be America's version of Amsterdam.
Or Sodom and Gomorrah
 
#92
#92
Here comes the Christianity bashing in 3,2,1...

OK, I have a question, for the people on here who are for gay marriage (and this is a legit question, I'm not being a smart ass), what should marriage be defined as? I mean in just a pure simple context... the union of two people who love one another, or how would you describe it?

As long as the government is in the business of handing out marriage licenses, it should be defined as a legal union of two individuals with all of the rights and privileges afforded to that couple (read: spouse insurance) along with all penalties of not honoring said union (read: divorce settlements). If the government wants to change the name of their license to a union license and leave the "marrying" to the churches, I have no problem with that. But, the government should not be able to hand a marriage license to a heterosexual couple, but not to a homosexual couple, IMO.
 
#93
#93
An earlier post posed an interesting question. If we define marriage as union between two people that love each other would two cousins or siblings be allowed to marry? What argument could you have against that?

It's not in the interest of the nation that inbreeding be legal...

I think that one in a stretch could apply this to carriers of a particular disease..that their union would be too risky for potential children..but this infringes upon their privacy. Who you are related to is not a matter of privacy, since birth certificates are legal, government-produced documents..so it seems fair game to me to regulate this.
 
#94
#94
It's not in the interest of the nation that inbreeding be legal...

I think that one in a stretch could apply this to carriers of a particular disease..that their union would be too risky for potential children..but this infringes upon their privacy. Who you are related to is not a matter of privacy, since birth certificates are legal, government-produced documents..so it seems fair game to me to regulate this.
Its not in the interest of the nation that fudge packing be made legal either... How the F are we gonna keep up with China if we arent putting out a decent number of babies
 
#95
#95
Even though I think the ruling is COMPLETELY moronic, let's hope for the best. If everyone is gay in California, the liberals will all die out in the state. Just trying to look at a positive.
 
#96
#96
Even though I think the ruling is COMPLETELY moronic, let's hope for the best. If everyone is gay in California, the liberals will all die out in the state. Just trying to look at a positive.

you've made some idiotic posts before, but you may have just topped yourself. Congrats.
 
#97
#97
you've made some idiotic posts before, but you may have just topped yourself. Congrats.

I really could care less what you think. :hi:

If you approve of this ruling and are a Christian then you should dust off your bible. There's a reason God destoyed Sodom and Gomorrah. God says it wrong, his natural world says its wrong, and I believe and have been taught its wrong. Therefore it must be wrong. I mean really, are gays gonna adopt?? That's a whole different conversation. This ruling is just one of the MANY reasons I don't ever care to live in that liberal trash hole of California. The scenery maybe nice, but there's more to a place to live than just scenery.
 
#98
#98
I wonder Eric,have you ever had sex out of wedlock? Lusted after another man's wife? Lied? Stolen?

If so, YOU may want to dust off your Bible.
 
#99
#99
I wonder Eric,have you ever had sex out of wedlock? Lusted after another man's wife? Lied? Stolen?

If so, YOU may want to dust off your Bible.

What does that have to do with a horrible ruling??

I have my own problems yes and fall short everyday, but that still doesn't change the fact that it's wrong. No one person is without sin, because we are born into it. We still have to try and do what is right and what is taught to us by the Bible.
 
Its not in the interest of the nation that fudge packing be made legal either... How the F are we gonna keep up with China if we arent putting out a decent number of babies

Your prejudice is almost overpowered by the stupidity of this post...almost.
 

VN Store



Back
Top