Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 39,726
- Likes
- 80,841
Sensitivity is high because when there is a rape or sexual assault situation, 90% of the people on here say the players didn't do anything wrong. "Rape cases" being handled well is like saying, "Man we dealt with that child abuse situation well," or "I'm glad that divorce went so well. The kids will get two Christmases and two birthdays now!"
Yes we all hope it's deal with it as well as possible. But women were scarred for the rest of their lives. Handling it well still leaves people's lives ruined.
As soon as the accuser complained about this they should have found someone else to hear the case. If for no other reason than it just looks bad, like this.
It only became an issue in last 24hrs. UF appointed him months ago. This isn't the first Student Conduct hearing he's been appointed over involving UF athletes.
The University of Florida is prohibited to comment on the existence or substance of student disciplinary matters under state and federal law.
However, I can tell you that our student conduct process may be handled by a hearing officer, who could be a university employee or an outside professional, or by a committee of faculty and students.
Any hearing officer and all committee members are trained and vetted for their impartiality. A hearing officer or committee member would not be disqualified or lack objectivity simply because he or she had been a student athlete decades earlier or purchases athletic tickets as more than 90,000 people do each year.
That doesn't make him unbiased.
But being a booster makes him bias? You'all have a hard time finding a faculty member who isn't a booster on some level.
My point is he just didn't get appointed this week. Thus hearing had been pushed back on their request on another occasion. Grand standing in the media.
Doubtful. You get sexually assaulted and all you require is an apology from accused to make it go away?
Who said that?
"To be clear, this letter is not intended to cast any aspersions about Mr. Schickel's character or his service to his alma mater," Clune wrote in an Aug. 2 letter to Hass. "However, UF should never have asked him to serve as an objective reviewer and decision-maker on this matter when the claim has been brought against a star member of the very team for which both he and his law partners have provided considerable financial support.
"Quite frankly, short of finding a relative of Mr. Calloway, I'm not sure how UF could have found someone with more conflicts [than] Mr. Schickel."