Can We Have...

#51
#51
rjd970 said:
This isn't surprising coming from somebody who sees things in such a simplistic black and white way.
Click to expand...

It boils down to this, some people are evil. You all want to try to make all these muslim terrorists look like innocent guys who just got caught up in the wrong crowd. Anyone who will strap a bomb on themselves is evil, pure and simple. But its hard for you bleeding hearts to see that.
 
#52
#52
volfanjustin said:
It boils down to this, some people are evil. You all want to try to make all these muslim terrorists look like innocent guys who just got caught up in the wrong crowd. Anyone who will strap a bomb on themselves is evil, pure and simple. But its hard for you bleeding hearts to see that.
Click to expand...

from reading the VN Politics forum you'd gather that Muslim=Terrorist, thats the issue here.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#54
#54
How about: Muslim = Terrorist + those too scared, intimidated or indifferent to speak out against terrorism + some silent minority who do oppose terrorism but somehow have not made it to the public medium.
 
#55
#55
volfanjustin said:
It boils down to this, some people are evil. You all want to try to make all these muslim terrorists look like innocent guys who just got caught up in the wrong crowd. Anyone who will strap a bomb on themselves is evil, pure and simple. But its hard for you bleeding hearts to see that.
Click to expand...

This is pathetic, even for a post from you.

Most of us here actually see the distinction between being Muslim and being a terrorist. The difference here is you think all Muslim's are terrorists, those of us with half a brain can see otherwise.

I'll agree that the Islamic theology is scary, but that doesn't mean every Muslim wants to strap a bomb to himself and kill infidels.
 
#58
#58
lawgator1 said:
I am proud of the fact that I was one of the first to recognize the deeply troubled weirdness and cut and paste fanatacism of gsvol. I've had him on ignore for close to a year and my life is all the sweeter for it.
Click to expand...

You have prescious little to be proud of, don'tcha? :)

rjd970 said:
Read = open the thread

Read does not equal actually reading the cut and pasted drivels you post.
Click to expand...

I must admit, you would be the leading board authority on drivel. :good!:
 
#60
#60
rjd970 said:
This is pathetic, even for a post from you.

Most of us here actually see the distinction between being Muslim and being a terrorist. The difference here is you think all Muslim's are terrorists, those of us with half a brain can see otherwise.

I'll agree that the Islamic theology is scary, but that doesn't mean every Muslim wants to strap a bomb to himself and kill infidels.
Click to expand...

Speaking of pathetic, it baffles my brain that some of you can come to such childish, immature conclusions about what is being said.

Although we will be seeing more acts of SJS in the future in America, the question isn't the numerical relationship between terrorist and muslim statistics, the question is about islam itself.

Take a step back and look at the bigger picture of the whole of islam.

Consider when and where islam gains control;
(just the twentieth century, although a 1400 year history is much the same and there are many more examples from just this past 100 years.)

The Sudanese genocide, 1983 to 2000.

The Greek genocide, 1914 to 1923.

The Assyrian genocide, throughout the 20th century.

I suppose all are at least faintly aware of the Armenian genocide, if not Balkan genocides before, during and after WWII.

No, of course not all muslims are stupid or hard up enough to buy the 70 odd virgins in paradise crap but all muslims subscribe to the idea of ruling the world in the name of islam, whatever that takes.

That is what is being adressed is not your Rosie O'Donnell dhimmi idea of equating islam and Christianity and anyone with half a brain can see that. :hi:
 
#61
#61
lumberjack4 said:
I would say that all Catholics are terrorists thanks to the IRA.
Click to expand...

The IRA didnt bomb in the name of faith. The IRA was purely political retaliation towards parliamentary rule and Great Britians occupation of Ireland, especially Belfast, Northern Ireland.
 
#63
#63
There was most certainly a religious aspect to the IRA and their attacks.
 
#66
#66
rjd970 said:
This is pathetic, even for a post from you.

Most of us here actually see the distinction between being Muslim and being a terrorist. The difference here is you think all Muslim's are terrorists, those of us with half a brain can see otherwise.

I'll agree that the Islamic theology is scary, but that doesn't mean every Muslim wants to strap a bomb to himself and kill infidels.
Click to expand...

As I have said before, but you may not have the mental capacity to understand, not all muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are muslim. Now if you are too scared to say that, I understand.
 
#67
#67
The Catholics and Protestants never got along in Ireland. The main reason, during the time of the IRA, was because the Catholics were loyal to Britian and British rule, so they were enemies of the IRAs attempt to unit Ireland and end British rule.
Click to expand...

I'm confused....I thought the P/IRA was made up of Catholics...the (British) loyalists were the Ulster boys, who were Protestant, no?
 
#69
#69
I can't help but find it ironic that the same ones here who are so quick to defend a "religion" that has murdered uncountless numbers of innocent civilians around the world and have had many attempts stopped, will so quickly trash and question Christianity. So I guess to be accepted by some on this board Christians need to strap on bombs, shoot up military bases or fly planes into buildings of those who won't convert to Christianity.
 
#70
#70
volfanjustin said:
I can't help but find it ironic that the same ones here who are so quick to defend a "religion" that has murdered uncountless numbers of innocent civilians around the world and have had many attempts stopped, will so quickly trash and question Christianity. So I guess to be accepted by some on this board Christians need to strap on bombs, shoot up military bases or fly planes into buildings of those who won't convert to Christianity.
Click to expand...

?

Run it back a few hundred years and you can find the equivilent.
 
#71
#71
Do me a favor and list off who you think the ones are that are so quick to "defend" Muslims but also "attack" Christians. I can think of one person that you might perceive to fit that category that is participating in this discussion. So, please expand on "same ones".

Regardless, and more to the point, is it that if someone doesn't accept all things Christian, then they are "attacking" Christianity and if they don't hate all things Muslim, then they are "defending" Muslims? If that is the case, then it would make sense that it is the "same ones" ... those would be the ones that see a little gray in life.
 
#73
#73
TennTradition said:
I'm confused....I thought the P/IRA was made up of Catholics...the (British) loyalists were the Ulster boys, who were Protestant, no?
Click to expand...

I believe you would be correct although I think the term 'protestant' is wrongly used.

Most Americans havn't the faintest clue about Irish history. (nor Lithuanian history or most any history, even true American history and Zinn's BS surely isn't the answer)

I got a heck of an education on the Irish history topic from an Irishman in Harry's New York bar in Paris, France way back when.

British treatment of the Irish, even in the twentieth century has been nothing short of barbaric.

There is an old Irish Ballad; "The hills of Donegal" that tells a heck of a story.

It starts out about one particular day in Irish history.

Each verse gives one more line from the manifests of ships that sailed that day from a particular Irish port.

There were hundreds of barrels of pork, beef, wheat, barley, sheep and cattle on the hoof and other food stuffs.

The final line goes thusly,"And on that day........5,000 people starved to death........In the hills of Donegal."
 
#74
#74
TennTradition said:
Do me a favor and list off who you think the ones are that are so quick to "defend" Muslims but also "attack" Christians. I can think of one person that you might perceive to fit that category that is participating in this discussion. So, please expand on "same ones".

Regardless, and more to the point, is it that if someone doesn't accept all things Christian, then they are "attacking" Christianity and if they don't hate all things Muslim, then they are "defending" Muslims? If that is the case, then it would make sense that it is the "same ones" ... those would be the ones that see a little gray in life.
Click to expand...

Its usually the same ones (not always, but usually) who when Christianity is brought up they doubt it, bad mouth it or say "hundreds of years ago Christians killed people to". But when some (me included) criticize a "religion" that has killed probably millions worldwide those same people get all upset.

Now there are some who discount all religions, no matter what they believe.

There are gray areas on some issues, but not this one.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top